Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
OK deny what YOU wrote, and I quoted. It is there for everyone to see.
I am not denying anything. Stilwater mentioned homosexuals sexually abusing children - I responded to her post.
If you have a problem with someone singling out homosexuals - talk to StillwaterTownie.
It is all here on the forum to be seen.
My point all along is that we shouldn't be arguing about gay vs. straight when it comes to sexual abuse of children. All sexual abuse of children is wrong.
This is why separating people into camps is so useless - it only serves as a way to pit one artifically made group against another - for divisive purposes - and the left is the architects of that.
So how exactly is it different if a child is raised in a home with a loving, caring same sex couple than being raised in a home with a loving, caring heterosexual couple or single parent again?
A family is a family no matter what sort of bigotry and ignorance you want to spew forth. You don't like it? More power to you and all that, but what gives you the right to determine what is and what isn't a family?
Last I checked heterosexuals aren't the shining image of the picture perfect family America wants them to be. If that were the case then why are so many rapists, murderers, criminals, etc coming out of heterosexual families?
What about hermaphrodites? Where do they fall into the grand scheme of things? Is it not possible for two hermaphrodites to have a family that is both loving and caring?
This post perfectly illustrates my point about the uselessness of labels.
I disagree. I for one have no idea what point you're trying to make. All I see is you dodging the questions in the post you just quoted...
You have willfully been ignoring what I write.
Labels are useless - why are people here even having a serious discussion over whether more sexual abuse of children is done by gay or straight people? Can't you see how stupid those labels are? Can there be ANY justification for the sexual abuse of a child? NO! So why would someone argue that for instance "more heterosexuals abuse children then homosexuals" as is often said on these threads. That is absolutely ridiculous - who cares what group is more responsible - NO CHILD SHOULD BE SEXUALLY ABUSED!
The only reason it is done is because the two groups have been artificially created by the left for the purpose of pitting one against each other so political control can be exerted. The same has done with race, and political ideologies.
The gay army likes the labels because it allows them to claim themselves as "persecuted" so that they can demand special rights.
Labels are stupid. What ever happenned to being human beings? All labels due is trivialize individual humanity.
I have said all this several times in this thread already- I should not have to repeat myself - if you are going to ignore me - just say so instead of playing dumb. The same goes for Arus and raison who ignore me when I answer their questions repeatedly and then like to pretend that they were never answered. This is a forum for serious argument and debate - not silly, sophomoric games.
The gay army likes the labels because it allows them to claim themselves as "persecuted" so that they can demand special rights.
No special rights are being asked for.
Anti-gay crybabies may say different, but the rights they ask for can be applied equally across the board afterwards. The rights being given right now, however, cannot.
I have not. And ordinarily, I'd agree with you that such labels mean nothing. But only along the lines of, it should never even come up, whether a person is homosexual or heterosexual. It should make no difference as to whether they should be able to get married or adopt children. However, to some people (i.e., people who oppose gay marriage and gay parenting), it does make a difference. And these are the ones pitting themselves against homosexuals.
At any rate, I won't be so easily distracted. I continue to observe that adiosToreador's questions are still unanswered
Yet you seem fit to label and damn a family ran by a homosexual couple.
How in the world does that make sense to you?
You are talking about rapists, murderers, ect...who come from heterosexual families - conveniently ignoring that people who commit those crimes often are also homosexuals.
Heterosexuals and homosexuals don't commit rape or murder - human beings do. That is why the labels are useless - they deflect from the root of what causes people to rape or murder and instead are used as a bludgeon against the opposite group.
The same is done with race and political ideology - it is devisive, destructive, and futile. It trivializes individual humanity - and makes everyone part of a faceless group who can be manipulated for political gain.
But what else do you expect from the socialist, collectiivist left?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
