Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And it wasn't the break-in that toppled Nixon. It was the cover up.
It might be, if Broadwell was correct and that annex was a black CIA interrogation site. We can't even get the Preezy to tell us where he was and what he knew on 9/11, and the shills in the Democratic Party are too busy tossing their principles and integrity out the window to bother asking the question.
All of that partisan cheer leading does nothing to make 0bama any less incompetent.
There are still over 15 more poor Americans living on Food Stamps that were added during his first term, so your fancy knee pads will do nothing to change that fact either.
Incompetent he may be what does that tell us about the party who couldn`t defeat him? If you can`t beat a black guy with a funny name and a bad economy ...no wonder you folks are so whiney these days. Your future is grim indeed.
All of that partisan cheer leading does nothing to make 0bama any less incompetent..
No partisan cheer leading, just the facts. Obama is president, he will continue to be president for the next four years, your continued attempts to change that have failed and will continue to fail, and you are losers.
No partisan cheer leading, just the facts. Obama is president, he will continue to be president for the next four years, your continued attempts to change that have failed and will continue to fail, and you are losers.
Of course he will be the president, I never suggested I could change that, and I never said he could be impeached for Benghazi either. 0bama being an inept boob or a callous jerk is not an impeachable offense.
I just find it interesting that 0bama's supporters can go out of there way to ignore the 15 million newly created poor under 0bama, and give him a complete pass on his failures. You guys act as if this is all a game, as if this was like whose sports team is winning.
Incompetent he may be what does that tell us about the party who couldn`t defeat him? If you can`t beat a black guy with a funny name and a bad economy ...no wonder you folks are so whiney these days. Your future is grim indeed.
It makes no difference who is in power except that whoever is in power in 2016 will be holding the hot potato when the music stops.
You can interchange hot potato with chair if you'd like for political correctness and the integrity of the potato.
I'll refer you to post 21. There is no good answer to that hypothetical reporter's question, which is why we are over two month past the 9/11 attack, and 0bama and his admin are still unwilling to answer any questions.
Hypothetical reporter? You mean make believe. The human mind is very powerful. If you are convinced of something, your mind will twist and create all of these reasons why what it believes is true.
All I say is step back and look at things from a reality based perspective. It becomes very obvious that the underlying reasons for a cover up don't make any logical sense.
This is reflected in the real world, where people who are convinced there is a cover up focus on imaginary reporters asking imaginary questions and getting imaginary answers.
Or focusing on two words in a statement approved by the intelligence community.
Hypothetical reporter? You mean make believe. The human mind is very powerful. If you are convinced of something, your mind will twist and create all of these reasons why what it believes is true.
All I say is step back and look at things from a reality based perspective. It becomes very obvious that the underlying reasons for a cover up don't make any logical sense.
This is reflected in the real world, where people who are convinced there is a cover up focus on imaginary reporters asking imaginary questions and getting imaginary answers.
Or focusing on two words in a statement approved by the intelligence community.
Well the "underlying reasons for a cover up" were the 2012 general election.
There's nothing fictional about the factcheck.org Benghazi timeline.
I'm sure you've decided to not look at it because it's so damning.
Your President stood and lied to your faces about this, four Americans are dead, and you're all OK with these actions.
This says a lot about the ethics and morals of our country and the left. It's more important for a man to win his popularity contest, even if it means he's lying to your face.
Your president, George W. Bush, stood up and lied to your faces, and had Colin Powell lie to the faces of the entire world in front of the United Nations, about non-existent WMD, and 4,486 Americans are DEAD BECAUSE OF THAT LIE, and you're all OK with these actions. Not one WORD of outrage at being lied into a war of aggression that killed thousands of Americans and over 100,000 innocent Iraqis.
Instead you work yourselves up into a frothing frenzy because the U.N. Ambassador said "extremists" instead of "terrorists" after 4 people had died, in an effort to protect more people from retalliation BY NOT TIPPING OUR HAND to the terrorists who killed them.
Well the "underlying reasons for a cover up" were the 2012 general election.
There's nothing fictional about the factcheck.org Benghazi timeline.
I'm sure you've decided to not look at it because it's so damning.
Yes, there's something grossly wrong with the factcheck.org Benghazi timeline: THEY DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.