Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yep. I just saw Fox do a story on some ying-yang who drained a pool onto the street and caused it to freeze over (apparently ice is slippery - who knew?) which caused multiple accidents.
NOBODY else is doing stories on obamacare, Benghazi, NSA, the IRS scandals. Yet, the Christie story has been the lead 24/7 with the msm.
Fox News is ALL OVER the Christie Bridge story.....and he's a republican!
They are also doing in depth journalism on the chemical spill in WV......which is a chemical used in the coal mining
Had the spill been of some chemical used in making solar panels, the msm would not even give it a mention.
ALL other news channels are biased to the point of being laughingstocks.
It's always been that way. Fox has always presented all sides of every story.
But liberals, who swear they don't watch Fox, miss the real stories. All they get is the Pablum being shoveled into their faces by other silly liberals who don't have a clue.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DewDropInn
Yep. I just saw Fox do a story on some ying-yang who drained a pool onto the street and caused it to freeze over (apparently ice is slippery - who knew?) which caused multiple accidents.
It's one hard-hitting expose after another.
They all do fillers. Seems odd some folks have never noticed that before.
Does anyone else find it odd that there are people who will fight tooth and nail to proclaim the source of their news as the best? It seems to me that the only reason this would happen is because that news source is the focal point of the individual's concepts, ideas, and understanding of how the world works. Without that news source, the individual would be forced to think for himself and would be entirely lost. Thus, the news source in question becomes the replacement for that individual's critical thought processing center. An attack on the news source is as good as an attack on the individual at that point.
That is not the reason...Fox caters to the ignorant masses in the US telling them what they want to hear, regardless if it is true or not.
They certainly do.
I saw them just the other day, displaying the President of the United States telling everyone, "If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. Period."
And earlier they showed the same guy saying that the violence in Benghazi was caused by some guy making an internet video.
They even showed some former ambassador saying the same thing, AFTER Obama knew it wasn't so.
As you said, they (or someone) is an expert at telling ignorant people what they want to hear, regardless if it is true or not.
NOBODY else is doing stories on obamacare, Benghazi, NSA, the IRS scandals. Yet, the Christie story has been the lead 24/7 with the msm.
Fox News is ALL OVER the Christie Bridge story.....and he's a republican!
They are also doing in depth journalism on the chemical spill in WV......which is a chemical used in the coal mining industry.
Had the spill been of some chemical used in making solar panels, the msm would not even give it a mention.
ALL other news channels are biased to the point of being laughingstocks.
Seems as someone is trying to clean Fox's bloody nose after the Judge dropped them with a right cross.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
