Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Philadelphia
1,165 posts, read 1,515,000 times
Reputation: 445

Advertisements

It is laughable to see people on here taking the Daily Mail seriously and thinking it somehow accurately represents the opinion of the average British citizen. If anything, I guarantee you that the large majority of Scottish people will lose absolutely no sleep over Obama's decision.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:33 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,346,581 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dockside View Post
And the Brits are ticked off - Margaret Thatcher funeral: President Obama won't send envoy - and leaves it to her old allies from Reagan era | Mail Online

Why not? This will be a busy week for the president pushing gun control issues. Really, they couldn't even spare that moron Biden? This is a truely classless move by a classless president.
It would seem logical to send people who served during the Thatcher era and had some connection to international diplomacy.
George Shultz and James Baker, both served as secretaries of state during the her time as PM, would be the right choices.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:35 PM
 
46,961 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29448
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Here is a list of the foreign dignitaries expected to attend former President Ronald Reagan's funeral on Friday...
President: Head of State

Prime Minister: Head of Government

Head of State > Head of Government.

Which is why a sh.tload of the countries who sent former PMs and the like to Ronald Reagan's funeral will be sending ambassadors to Thatchers'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:39 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Since so many of you conservative types love Thatcher so much, why don't you hop your own asses in a plane at your expense and attend the funeral? Ya know...since its so important to you.

Why are you demanding that we spend taxpayer dollars to send Obama to a funeral for someone that hasn't been a player in two decades?

She's dead...get over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:41 PM
 
Location: In an indoor space
7,685 posts, read 6,196,107 times
Reputation: 5154
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine View Post
It would seem logical to send people who served during the Thatcher era and had some connection to international diplomacy.
George Shultz and James Baker, both served as secretaries of state during the her time as PM, would be the right choices.

Okay fine but they are no longer S.O.S., but who's the current president of the USA?

Slapping faces is one thing Obama has practice in.

There's no party and golfing afterwards is why he isn't attending imo.

He only cares for himself and nobody who died even Americans imo.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
President: Head of State

Prime Minister: Head of Government

Head of State > Head of Government.

Which is why a sh.tload of the countries who sent former PMs and the like to Ronald Reagan's funeral will be sending ambassadors to Thatchers'.
Agreed! Obama is not going because he can't profit for himself imo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:43 PM
 
Location: In an indoor space
7,685 posts, read 6,196,107 times
Reputation: 5154
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
Since so many of you conservative types love Thatcher so much, why don't you hop your own asses in a plane at your expense and attend the funeral? Ya know...since its so important to you.

Why are you demanding that we spend taxpayer dollars to send Obama to a funeral for someone that hasn't been a player in two decades?

She's dead...get over it.
Obama is POTUS - he imo should be representing the USA.

This is not about any one political party.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:47 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol-its-good4U View Post
Obama is POTUS - he imo should be representing the USA.

This is not about any one political party.
So his presence is gonna bring her back to life?

In the grand scheme, no one cares. She'll be just as dead regardless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:50 PM
 
2,861 posts, read 3,851,013 times
Reputation: 2351
Always tasteful and classy...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 03:57 PM
 
Location: Illinois Delta
5,767 posts, read 5,015,185 times
Reputation: 2063
Quote:
Originally Posted by lol-its-good4U View Post
Obama is POTUS - he imo should be representing the USA.

This is not about any one political party.


We have just suffered an unspeakable act of terrorism; if President Obama went, the RW would scream to the heavens that he's deserting America in a time of need. The delegation appointed is comprised of well-respected (for some) senior officials who knew and worked with her, which is fitting. President Obama has enough to deal with to take the time to make such a trip. Myself, I'd prefer that he remain here to deal with Boston, North Korea, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-16-2013, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Not where I want to be
24,509 posts, read 24,198,053 times
Reputation: 24282
Quote:
Originally Posted by seattlerain View Post
All living former US presidents were invited to attend...none of them are. Where is the outrage that Bush I, Bush II and Clinton are not attending.
Bush I is probably too sick...his health is NOT good. Bush II only knew her as one of Bush I's kids. Clinton...he never dealt with her.

Nancy Reagan is probably too frail to go too. Kissenger and Schultz worked with her, they are good people to go. BUT Osama should send a current government official as a "courtesy" since the Brits are our biggest allies.

Quote:
Originally Posted by steven_h View Post
It's no surprise since Obama is an anti-colonialist, as outlined in "Dreams of My Father"

-Feb 2009: Obama takes bust of Churchill out of the Oval Office
-March 2009: Obama “too tired,” to properly host Prime Minister Gordon Brown. Obama Administration failed to host the Prime Minister at a formal dinner, nor did he receive the usual joint press conference that the British government has come to expect during visits to the United States.
-March 2009: Obama gives Prime Minister Gordon Brown a box of DVD’s as a gift (cheap snub). What’s worse, the set of DVD’s was coded for the United States and unreadable by UK DVD players (double snub)
-September 2009: Obama refuses private meeting with Prime Minister Gordon Brown during UN Summit
-April 2009: First Lady Michelle Obama breaks protocol by touching the Queen’s back
-January 2011: Obama calls France America’s ‘strongest ally’
-May 2011: After toasting the Queen, Obama continues speaking as the band starts playing ‘God Save the Queen.’ (this was a complete break from Royal protocol during a Queens toast which he (Obama) called for)
-May 2011: Barack Obama snubs British scientists by refusing to receive Royal Society medal
-December 2011: President Obama refers to the British Embassy as the “English Embassy”
-June 2012: President Obama refers to the Falkland Islands as ‘the Maldives’

The list is endless, and there has never been a President, save Andrew Jackson and James Madison, so openly hostile towards Great Britain.
Shame on the Osamas ^^^^^^. I sure hope the people who voted PC have learned their lesson. Colin Powell was the only one you should have voted for. (if he had run)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top