Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The issue at hand is what makes guns (a dangerous object) different than other dangerous objects (dynamite)?
Wrong as usual. The issue was whether a five-year-old should be allowed free and unfettered access to a gun. (To most of us, that isn't even an issue. But it's the subject of the thread.) See the OP.
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,861,253 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by ambient
What obsession is there in your mind to require a small child to be introduced to this hobby so early in life?
Of course a little kid will "love it." They will also love it if you let them chuck a live grenade over the fence or light a trashcan on fire.
Why not let your kid grow up and mature a bit more before letting them get into firearms handling? Is there some fear that if your kid isn't firing rounds of ammo RIGHT NOW before he's even in grade school, he will turn into some sort of a gay liberal by age ten?
The only fear I see here is your fear of an inanimate object.
I'm not fine with toddlers and pre-schoolers being made to handle firearms.
Another way liberal losers try to change the subject after getting their heads handed to them in an argument, is by inventing new "issues" that haven't been brought up at all, as this one does here. I've underlined the relevant fib above.
Wrong as usual. The issue was whether a five-year-old should be allowed free and unfettered access to a gun. (To most of us, that isn't even an issue. But it's the subject of the thread.) See the OP.
Read.
Reading is key.
I think the more appropriate thread question is whether or not such parents should have custody of children.
A person is too young to handle a firearm when he has not learned to and shown the desire and ability to do so safely..........For some 6 years of age might be ok but for others 60 years of age is not long enough.
Location: Anchorage Suburbanites and part time Willowbillies
1,708 posts, read 1,861,253 times
Reputation: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by sickofnyc
I think gun nuts give guns as baby shower gifts.
I gave my wife a firearm for our first Valentine's Day as a married couple and enrolled her in a personal safety course, a firearm safety course and a concealed carry course, (that we both took together). She said that it was the most loving gift she could imagine. I cared enough about her safety that I did all that for her.
Last edited by hogfamily; 05-01-2013 at 05:42 PM..
The only fear I see here is your fear of an inanimate object.
Sigh... you're totally wrong. Here's you, and there's the point that just flew miles over your head.
The fear is not of the gun; the fear is of a pre-schooler having access to that gun for the sake said pre-schooler's safety.
Why do you people have an inability to distinguish between acceptable gun use for an adult and unacceptable gun use for a small kid with the maturity of a squirrel who hasn't even yet sat in a first-grade classroom?
Another way liberal losers try to change the subject after getting their heads handed to them in an argument, is by inventing new "issues" that haven't been brought up at all, as this one does here. I've underlined the relevant fib above.
Yes he wasn't forced to take the gun, he could have refused, after all his life experience should have made him aware of the dangers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.