Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1. Were the officers "incompetent" or was their management (higher level officers) derelict in their duty as far as ensuring that these officers were properly trained?
2. Have we done anything to address what caused the problem, or are we just throwing low level personel under the bus?
3. How high does the responsibilty go?
And how in the world can such idiocy exist that would attempt to make Pres. Obama responsible for these Officer's inability to maintain their unit's readiness.
I don't know about "right wing extremists", but as a relatively independant person, I do. I have to question what kind of failures of leadership have lead to the decay in readiness of our strategic nuclear forces. Based on what is reported, I would have to say that military leadership has failed to do their job. And the leader of the US military is???
So identifying and acting to fix a problem is bad leadership?
So identifying and acting to fix a problem is bad leadership?
Only in the fever swamps of RWNJ toolery.
I know. I can't figure it out. These people were found to be incompetent so they were demoted. And the right wing blames Obama. What kind of effed up universe do those people live in?
And how in the world can such idiocy exist that would attempt to make Pres. Obama responsible for these Officer's inability to maintain their unit's readiness.
So, in Obamabot land, the head of the US military bears no responsibility of the performance of those under his command? Let me guess, it's Bush's fault, right?
Of course Obama bears responsibility. And that responsibility is given to those in the chain-of-command to carry out the policies.
Do you really expect Obama (or any other president) to spend time reviewing profiles of all the members of the military all around the world assessing their capabilities and abilities? Of course not. Only an idiot would.
So, in Obamabot land, the head of the US military bears no responsibility of the performance of those under his command?
Of course he does; that's why he relieved these people of their responsibilities, which the Obama-hate gang is bitching about.
I haven't seen such blatant dishonesty and hypocrisy since Obama let the tea party bully him into attacking Libya, and immediately plunged a knife into his back.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
