Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:23 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,384,804 times
Reputation: 390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post

He was using legal prescription drugs.

possession of marijuana and vandalism -
Hmmm . .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:25 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,861,475 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by jazzarama View Post
Look, I'm considered a gz supporter by the IAmTrayvon's, and even I can 'dispute' who initiated the physical altercation. gz could have thrown the 1st punch and missed, or hit tm on the shoulder, or had the punch blocked, etc. I believe tm threw the 1st punch, but other than what gz says happened, it can't be 'proven.'

If you ask if there's any evidence that gz hit 1st, the answer is no.
I'd just like to hear the most commonly held rationale for GZ's portrayal as Satan himself.

Because if they'll concede the provocation aspect, which I don't see much argument against, even from them, then wow, just wow.

Last edited by rw47; 05-26-2013 at 09:35 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:31 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,384,804 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
IMO, you're wrong. TM had no criminal record. GZ has an arrest record. GZ was using some pretty strong prescription drugs. A drug is no less harmful b/c it is prescription. GZ has a history of violence.

We have no idea if TM was a regular user of marijuana. He has no history of violence. It's not clear if his "vandalism" was a criminal act. Lots of kids commit the same at school. GZ may have, for all we know, when he was in school. And, more to the point, it's irrelevant. GZ did not know TM when he KILLED him. He didn't know anything about him. He could not have used any information about TM when he shot him dead.
Hey, good thinking!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:33 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,671,534 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mashed Potatoes View Post
Believe it or not, there are actually morons who believe TM never laid a finger on GZ. They think GZ walked up, shot TM, then injured himself to make it look good for the cops. All of the evidence in the world would never convince them otherwise, they see it as nothing more than an act of racism.

The scary part is people like this are actually out in public, among us, and they choose to breed and vote.

Euthanization is whats needed for people like that.
And that's the truth!

The very fact that Zimm shot Tray from the front proves Zimm was acting in self-defense. It's obvious Tray was going after Zimm; otherwise, the shot would have been in the back. Unless, of course, Zimm ran around to the front of Tray and then shot him. Why would he do that when a shot through the back would have worked just as well if all he wanted to do was kill him because he's *gasp* walking while black?

Thinking is fundamental but Traybots don't do that, even on a rudimentary basis.

These threads are hilarious, if nothing else. I can't see a lot of the responses, but use of the 'quote' button suffices to give me my daily giggles at the expense of the brainless Trayvonistas.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:35 AM
 
6,137 posts, read 4,861,475 times
Reputation: 1517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
And that's the truth!

The very fact that Zimm shot Tray from the front proves Zimm was acting in self-defense. It's obvious Tray was going after Zimm; otherwise, the shot would have been in the back. Unless, of course, Zimm ran around to the front of Tray and then shot him. Why would he do that when a shot through the back would have worked just as well if all he wanted to do was kill him because he's *gasp* walking while black?

Thinking is fundamental but Traybots don't do that, even on a rudimentary basis.

These threads are hilarious, if nothing else.
Not necessarily. Obviously he didn't shoot him from behind, but he could have started the altercation. Not that there's any evidence of that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Foot of the Rockies
90,297 posts, read 120,779,853 times
Reputation: 35920
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
And that's the truth!

The very fact that Zimm shot Tray from the front proves Zimm was acting in self-defense. It's obvious Tray was going after Zimm; otherwise, the shot would have been in the back. Unless, of course, Zimm ran around to the front of Tray and then shot him. Why would he do that when a shot through the back would have worked just as well if all he wanted to do was kill him because he's *gasp* walking while black?

Thinking is fundamental but Traybots don't do that, even on a rudimentary basis.

These threads are hilarious, if nothing else.
Clearly, no need for a trial at all!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:47 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,384,804 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
And that's the truth!

The very fact that Zimm shot Tray from the front proves Zimm was acting in self-defense. It's obvious Tray was going after Zimm; otherwise, the shot would have been in the back. Unless, of course, Zimm ran around to the front of Tray and then shot him. Why would he do that when a shot through the back would have worked just as well if all he wanted to do was kill him because he's *gasp* walking while black?

Thinking is fundamental but Traybots don't do that, even on a rudimentary basis.

These threads are hilarious, if nothing else. I can't see a lot of the responses, but use of the 'quote' button suffices to give me my daily giggles at the expense of the brainless Trayvonistas.
Maybe Zimmerman was working on some kind of merit badge for his Competence Resume.

Didn't he prove he was more competent than the police?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:49 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,384,804 times
Reputation: 390
Martin knew a little bit about hard work and achievement.

Zimmerman - not so much.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:49 AM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,565,372 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katiana View Post
No, the hypocrisy comes from the GZ supporters who talk about Trayvon, a complete stranger to GZ at the time of the killing, which GZ had admitted to, calling Trayvon a thug, a drug abuser, yada, yada, who won't look at GZ arrest record, his drug use, his anger management issues.



What's the point of a trial if this is so cut and dried?
Because some prosecutor hopes to score some politican points when someone shot Obama's son. That is the point.

I wouldn't be surprised if Z is convicted but that would be a political outcome not a legal outcome. It's not rational and by no means just but it's to satisfy certain ethnic group. We saw that in Rodney King's trial and I wouldn't be surprised to see it here.

Legally speaking I don't believe Z did anything wrong and all the evidence support what he claimed. This was why he was only charged when under enormous political pressure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Area 51.5
13,887 posts, read 13,671,534 times
Reputation: 9174
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Not necessarily. Obviously he didn't shoot him from behind, but he could have started the altercation. Not that there's any evidence of that.
How do you start an altercation from behind? Point and giggle? That's hardly an altercation. There's no evidence Zimm even touched Tray. If someone 'starts an altercation' from behind, keep walking. Don't turn around and bash in his face. Seems simple enough, even for the simple minded.

No, Zimm didn't 'start an altercation' from behind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top