Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Because some prosecutor hopes to score some politican points when someone shot Obama's son. That is the point.
I wouldn't be surprised if Z is convicted but that would be a political outcome not a legal outcome. It's not rational and by no means just but it's to satisfy certain ethnic group. We saw that in Rodney King's trial and I wouldn't be surprised to see it here.
Legally speaking I don't believe Z did anything wrong and all the evidence support what he claimed. This was why he was only charged when under enormous political pressure.
No ****, sherlock. I don't think anyone would be as stupid as to insinuate such. At least try to get the point straight before you argue against it. Jesus.
Why are you bringing up GZ's record? To judge his character to determine who is and who is not telling the truth, and who is or is not the type of person who would provoke a physical altercation.
When this trial starts and they begin to present evidence after jury selection, I'm guessing that I'll be LMAO at many of your posts. Mr. Barrow, you appear to have almost no factual knowledge/understanding of what will or will not be admissible in this case......yet you post like you think you can just figure these things out by "common sense." LOL Check out the Florida Rules of Evidence in criminal cases just to give yourself a clue. There's a reason people have to go to law school and then pass the state bar examine in order to practice law in our courts. Btw, the DEFENDENT is on trial, not the victim; the DEFENDENT'S character is most certainly relevant as the jury will be asked to believe ONLY HIS WORD regarding what happened in order to acquit, and he has already been proven to be a liar and assisted his wife in committing perjury in THIS VERY CASE. Additionally, have you ever even heard of "fighting words"? GEORGE ZIMMERMAN is charged with 2nd degree murder and HE WILL BE ON TRIAL, so absolutely his VERACITY will be a major issue.
Last edited by FancyFeast5000; 05-26-2013 at 10:21 AM..
Why dont you defend Tervon's right to stand his ground and defend himself??? If treyvon were a year older, he could have excersized his constitutional 2nd amendment right to conceal carry...
He would have been alive today. guns do save lives.
Which says he would of killed Z with his gun instead of attempting to do so, with his arms.
The very fact that Zimm shot Tray from the front proves Zimm was acting in self-defense. It's obvious Tray was going after Zimm; otherwise, the shot would have been in the back. Unless, of course, Zimm ran around to the front of Tray and then shot him. Why would he do that when a shot through the back would have worked just as well if all he wanted to do was kill him because he's *gasp* walking while black?
Thinking is fundamental but Traybots don't do that, even on a rudimentary basis.
These threads are hilarious, if nothing else. I can't see a lot of the responses, but use of the 'quote' button suffices to give me my daily giggles at the expense of the brainless Trayvonistas.
Indeed, "thinking," along with at least some basic factual knowledge regarding how our legal system works, is FUNDAMENTAL when trying to discuss/analyze a high profile criminal case, and it certainly seems from reading lots of posts that someone who is constantly implying/calling other posters stupid and claims they aren't capable of "thinking" is blinded by a very inaccurate belief in their own "brilliance" ........ego out of control. Seems folks who are actually quite insecure about their own intelligence are most often the very people who claim to be smarter than everyone else about EVERYTHING, including the laws in states where they don't live......and professions in which they have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE.
When this trial starts and they begin to present evidence after jury selection, I'm guessing that I'll be LMAO at many of your posts. Mr. Barrow, you appear to have almost no factual knowledge/understanding of what will or will not be admissible in this case......yet you post like you think you can just figure these things out by "common sense." LOL Check out the Florida Rules of Evidence in criminal cases just to give yourself a clue. There's a reason people have to go to law school and then pass the state bar examine in order to practice law in our courts. Btw, the DEFENDENT is on trial, not the victim; the DEFENDENT'S character is most certainly relevant as the jury will have be believe ONLY HIS WORD regarding what happened in order to acquit, and he has already been proven to be a liar and assisted his wife in committing perjury in THIS VERY CASE. Additionally, have you ever even heard of "fighting words"? GEORGE ZIMMERMAN is charged with 2nd degree murder and HE WILL BE ON TRIAL, so absolutely his VERACITY will be a major issue.
I don't really see anything at all to laugh about in this issue. To make it worse the charges should not of even been . If there was a female standing by while this slamming of the head was going on by a complete stranger with top strength and shot him, she would be a hero for courage and saving the life, one more slam of the head, at night in this what we know...is how people get kllled.
All thats being said is had this happen to another, you refuse assistance to the one being killed, its as simple as that.
I regard stalking as provocation for face to face confrontation.
Are you following me?
No chance he is "intellectually" following you. Some people are just too blinded by their own insecurity about their intelligence to ever admit to not understanding ANYTHING.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.