Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:53 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,385,313 times
Reputation: 390

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lifeexplorer View Post
Because some prosecutor hopes to score some politican points when someone shot Obama's son. That is the point.

I wouldn't be surprised if Z is convicted but that would be a political outcome not a legal outcome. It's not rational and by no means just but it's to satisfy certain ethnic group. We saw that in Rodney King's trial and I wouldn't be surprised to see it here.

Legally speaking I don't believe Z did anything wrong and all the evidence support what he claimed. This was why he was only charged when under enormous political pressure.
Are you some kind of, like, racist, or something?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:59 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,409,029 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
No ****, sherlock. I don't think anyone would be as stupid as to insinuate such. At least try to get the point straight before you argue against it. Jesus.

Why are you bringing up GZ's record? To judge his character to determine who is and who is not telling the truth, and who is or is not the type of person who would provoke a physical altercation.
When this trial starts and they begin to present evidence after jury selection, I'm guessing that I'll be LMAO at many of your posts. Mr. Barrow, you appear to have almost no factual knowledge/understanding of what will or will not be admissible in this case......yet you post like you think you can just figure these things out by "common sense." LOL Check out the Florida Rules of Evidence in criminal cases just to give yourself a clue. There's a reason people have to go to law school and then pass the state bar examine in order to practice law in our courts. Btw, the DEFENDENT is on trial, not the victim; the DEFENDENT'S character is most certainly relevant as the jury will be asked to believe ONLY HIS WORD regarding what happened in order to acquit, and he has already been proven to be a liar and assisted his wife in committing perjury in THIS VERY CASE. Additionally, have you ever even heard of "fighting words"? GEORGE ZIMMERMAN is charged with 2nd degree murder and HE WILL BE ON TRIAL, so absolutely his VERACITY will be a major issue.

Last edited by FancyFeast5000; 05-26-2013 at 10:21 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 09:59 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,385,313 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamBarrow View Post
Not necessarily. Obviously he didn't shoot him from behind, but he could have started the altercation. Not that there's any evidence of that.
Zimmerman never smiled and said he was sorry for scaring Martin.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:01 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,409,029 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
Are you some kind of, like, racist, or something?
LOL. Great question.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:03 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,385,313 times
Reputation: 390
Zimmerman failed as a wannabe security guard.

Now, what's left for him?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:06 AM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,133,213 times
Reputation: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chimuelojones View Post
Why dont you defend Tervon's right to stand his ground and defend himself??? If treyvon were a year older, he could have excersized his constitutional 2nd amendment right to conceal carry...

He would have been alive today. guns do save lives.
Which says he would of killed Z with his gun instead of attempting to do so, with his arms.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:10 AM
 
3,846 posts, read 2,385,313 times
Reputation: 390
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
No, Zimm didn't 'start an altercation' from behind.
I regard stalking as provocation for face to face confrontation.

Are you following me?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:11 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,409,029 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dale Cooper View Post
And that's the truth!

The very fact that Zimm shot Tray from the front proves Zimm was acting in self-defense. It's obvious Tray was going after Zimm; otherwise, the shot would have been in the back. Unless, of course, Zimm ran around to the front of Tray and then shot him. Why would he do that when a shot through the back would have worked just as well if all he wanted to do was kill him because he's *gasp* walking while black?

Thinking is fundamental but Traybots don't do that, even on a rudimentary basis.

These threads are hilarious, if nothing else. I can't see a lot of the responses, but use of the 'quote' button suffices to give me my daily giggles at the expense of the brainless Trayvonistas.
Indeed, "thinking," along with at least some basic factual knowledge regarding how our legal system works, is FUNDAMENTAL when trying to discuss/analyze a high profile criminal case, and it certainly seems from reading lots of posts that someone who is constantly implying/calling other posters stupid and claims they aren't capable of "thinking" is blinded by a very inaccurate belief in their own "brilliance" ........ego out of control. Seems folks who are actually quite insecure about their own intelligence are most often the very people who claim to be smarter than everyone else about EVERYTHING, including the laws in states where they don't live......and professions in which they have absolutely NO EXPERIENCE.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:12 AM
 
3,448 posts, read 3,133,213 times
Reputation: 478
Quote:
Originally Posted by FancyFeast5000 View Post
When this trial starts and they begin to present evidence after jury selection, I'm guessing that I'll be LMAO at many of your posts. Mr. Barrow, you appear to have almost no factual knowledge/understanding of what will or will not be admissible in this case......yet you post like you think you can just figure these things out by "common sense." LOL Check out the Florida Rules of Evidence in criminal cases just to give yourself a clue. There's a reason people have to go to law school and then pass the state bar examine in order to practice law in our courts. Btw, the DEFENDENT is on trial, not the victim; the DEFENDENT'S character is most certainly relevant as the jury will have be believe ONLY HIS WORD regarding what happened in order to acquit, and he has already been proven to be a liar and assisted his wife in committing perjury in THIS VERY CASE. Additionally, have you ever even heard of "fighting words"? GEORGE ZIMMERMAN is charged with 2nd degree murder and HE WILL BE ON TRIAL, so absolutely his VERACITY will be a major issue.
I don't really see anything at all to laugh about in this issue. To make it worse the charges should not of even been . If there was a female standing by while this slamming of the head was going on by a complete stranger with top strength and shot him, she would be a hero for courage and saving the life, one more slam of the head, at night in this what we know...is how people get kllled.

All thats being said is had this happen to another, you refuse assistance to the one being killed, its as simple as that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-26-2013, 10:13 AM
 
8,560 posts, read 6,409,029 times
Reputation: 1173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
I regard stalking as provocation for face to face confrontation.

Are you following me?
No chance he is "intellectually" following you. Some people are just too blinded by their own insecurity about their intelligence to ever admit to not understanding ANYTHING.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top