Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
hate hate hate hate hate I will blow the president hate hate
repeat
Do you ever want to post any facts into your postings thus giving you a little bit of credibility? Dont think you ever will try.
Obama has very good students. When this Country is in the ditch, wonder if then, they will care.
Stop giving credit where credit is definitely not due, and stop blaming others for Obama's own screw ups. Obama is all about me, me, me, me me me, blame the other guy! A little old in the game, and little stale, and oh so predictible.
.. is how Republicans have been saying for DECADES that the way to stimulate job growth was supply-side economics. Take the pressure off corporate producers and they'll make profits, and then hire.
Well, Obama has achieved exactly that. Corporate profits, p/e ratios, and market capitalizations are all VERY high. According to Republicans, everything should be falling into place.
You must have missed the part about supply-side economics which involves competition being required to hire..
The poverty president is the best name I can think of. He has destroyed the middle class and blacks have suffered more under Obama than any president in history.
Wait what? LOL. seriously dude, there is one president. He has been president for 5+ years. He has a track record.
And his track records is much better than that of his predecessor. Ignoring the past doesn't add to your credibility. It detracts from it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd
Barak Obama doesnt get a pass because in your eyes, someone else "was worse".
He's not getting a pass. He's getting acknowledged for the successes he's been able to help bring about, despite maniacal obstructionism from his opponents - the first president to actually confront an opposition that publicly pledged to do whatever they had to to obstruct any improvement this president attempts to effect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma
Someone who continually attempts to deflect from the topic at hand really shouldn't be talking about readily disposable claims.
No deflection here. You must simply be upset that you're not getting an unrebutted soapbox for your perspective. That's a big problem right-wingers have: They refuse to acknowledge that reasonable people disagree with them.
And his track records is much better than that of his predecessor. Ignoring the past doesn't add to your credibility. It detracts from it.
He's not getting a pass. He's getting acknowledged for the successes he's been able to help bring about, despite maniacal obstructionism from his opponents - the first president to actually confront an opposition that publicly pledged to do whatever they had to to obstruct any improvement this president attempts to effect.
No deflection here. You must simply be upset that you're not getting an unrebutted soapbox for your perspective. That's a big problem right-wingers have: They refuse to acknowledge that reasonable people disagree with them.
A lot.
Quote:
And his track records is much better than that of his predecessor.
Someone who just posted this ^^ says they're not deflecting? Once again:
Liberal/Obama Supporter Auto Response Protocol™
1. The source isn't valid
2. That's racist
3. GOP obstruction
4. But...but...but George W. Bush
5. Haters gonna hate
6. Sour grapes- your guy lost
7. Repeat 1,2,3,4,5 and/or 6 as needed then insult the opposition for failing to support this great man, declare victory, and move on
Numbers 3 and 4 this time. The topic is Obama's economic policies and it's But...but...but George W. Bush. So what exactly has been obstructed that would have benefitted the nation had it passed? The big problem is the LWNJ's who refuse to admit that their emperor has no clothes.
And his track records is much better than that of his predecessor. Ignoring the past doesn't add to your credibility. It detracts from it.
He's not getting a pass. He's getting acknowledged for the successes he's been able to help bring about, despite maniacal obstructionism from his opponents - the first president to actually confront an opposition that publicly pledged to do whatever they had to to obstruct any improvement this president attempts to effect.
No deflection here. You must simply be upset that you're not getting an unrebutted soapbox for your perspective. That's a big problem right-wingers have: They refuse to acknowledge that reasonable people disagree with them.
Census on Obama’s 1st Term: Real Median Income Down $2,627; People in Poverty Up 6,667,000; Record 46,496,000 Now Poor -
Which has me wondering what the hell you're smoking because for median incomes to fall, lower than what they were at the bottom of the recession, is one hell of an accomplishment.
I read the "article." It is nothing but a film-flam hit piece. It rails against the stimulus bill, which the CBO and private economies conclude worked. It also rails against trillions in unfunded liabilities, which are mainly state liabilities and has nothing to do with Obama policies. Moreover, that's been a problem for decades.
I read the "article." It is nothing but a film-flam hit piece. It rails against the stimulus bill, which the CBO and private economies conclude worked. It also rails against trillions in unfunded liabilities, which are mainly state liabilities and has nothing to do with Obama policies. Moreover, that's been a problem for decades.
What article, because the one I posted right before your posting, doesnt mention the stimulus, nor unfunded liabilities (which are in no way state liabilities, where the hell did you get that crackpot theory)
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.