Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-27-2013, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,328,605 times
Reputation: 7624

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post

worse than that was him ignoring the Aids epidemic,
It would be nice if that myth would stop being repeated...

http://www.city-data.com/forum/29905853-post61.html

 
Old 11-27-2013, 05:05 PM
 
12,265 posts, read 6,478,891 times
Reputation: 9440
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Who could possibly be surprised by this?

Bush's approval was driven down by the media. Obama has been supported by the media through thick and thin. His disapproval is all of his own making.

Reagan was a great President. No question about it.
It was the "media" that made Gomer look bad. Good one.
 
Old 11-27-2013, 05:09 PM
 
24,421 posts, read 23,084,509 times
Reputation: 15029
If nothing else Reagan at least made it okay to be proud to be American and he restored optimism after the Carter malaise.
Bush 43 wasn't much and Obama's been even worse. Actually, if Obama wasn't worse than Bush 43 you'd swear that Bush 43 was still in office.
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:05 PM
 
Location: South Bay
1,404 posts, read 1,032,648 times
Reputation: 525
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy
Who could possibly be surprised by this?

Bush's approval was driven down by the media. Obama has been supported by the media through thick and thin. His disapproval is all of his own making.

Reagan was a great President. No question about it.


Quote:
Originally Posted by gmagoo View Post
It was the "media" that made Gomer look bad. Good one.
Another one-sided example of a dysfunctional view of things. Are you saying that the "media" hasn't been Obama's mouthpiece? Main scream media raked Bush over the coals for anything, openly, and with malice.

Anyone who is against Obama is instantly labeled something by main scream.

The better statement is that it's the media working frantically to make Obama look good. And finally, THEY are at wits end. Obama isn't used to being grilled by ABC and CNN, but it is beginning to happen.
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:09 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 27 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,560,540 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Welcome to the forum! Shooting the messenger is ALWAYS an effective way to get your point across!
Yea, because you have never once dismissed an entire argument just because the source is left wing
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:10 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
13,561 posts, read 10,364,797 times
Reputation: 8252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bulldogdad View Post
Sorry buddy boy the Poll was sponsored by.... WAIT FOR IT...... The Economist- A left leaning rag.

HAH!!! even the Liberals are sick of this POSTUS.
The Economist is hardly a "left-leaning" rag. It's based in the UK, and probably is a little bit right of center, both in the UK and the US political spectrum.
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:12 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 27 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,573 posts, read 16,560,540 times
Reputation: 6044
Quote:
Originally Posted by surfman View Post
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy
Who could possibly be surprised by this?

Bush's approval was driven down by the media. Obama has been supported by the media through thick and thin. His disapproval is all of his own making.

Reagan was a great President. No question about it.


Another one-sided example of a dysfunctional view of things. Are you saying that the "media" hasn't been Obama's mouthpiece? Main scream media raked Bush over the coals for anything, openly, and with malice.

Anyone who is against Obama is instantly labeled something by main scream.

The better statement is that it's the media working frantically to make Obama look good. And finally, THEY are at wits end. Obama isn't used to being grilled by ABC and CNN, but it is beginning to happen.
You are making a comparative argument and yet you post nothing to back it up.

What exactly do you define as "grilled" and if so, why do you believe Bush was grilled to that Degree and Obama wasnt.

What makes you believe Obama is being propped up by the media, but Bush's was pushed down by it, again use examples, not just blanket statements.
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,535,610 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Don't worry. "Historians" will be sure to scrub BO clean of all his sins.
No one can scrub clean the stink of the Bush/Cheney era. Perhaps the most destructive duo to ever disgrace the office.
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:24 PM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,535,610 times
Reputation: 21679
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverkris View Post
The Economist is hardly a "left-leaning" rag. It's based in the UK, and probably is a little bit right of center, both in the UK and the US political spectrum.

You are correct.

The Economist, by the way, is incredibly informative about world affairs, and does not have a political axe to grind about American politics, which I truly love, it is great to read about politics without any bias added to the discussion.

If anything, it leans conservative, as evidenced by it attacking Obama a few months ago for not bombing Syria. The latest issue takes aim at Obama once again.



America and the world: The man who used to walk on water | The Economist
 
Old 11-27-2013, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,511 posts, read 33,328,605 times
Reputation: 7624
Quote:
Originally Posted by odanny View Post
No one can scrub clean the stink of the Bush/Cheney era. Perhaps the most destructive duo to ever disgrace the office.
Even though this thread is not about Bush/Cheney, would did they (and they alone) do that was so destructive?

If you bring up the Afghan and Iraq war, that passed through Congress. At least Bush/Cheney were not using drones.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top