Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:41 AM
 
16,431 posts, read 22,194,526 times
Reputation: 9623

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Good, then they can get slapped down by the highest court in the land.
Now we get to the real issue. What if that happens and Texas refuses to comply? How far will the Federal Government push it? They have backed off of Colorado on the MJ law.

 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:48 AM
 
608 posts, read 482,212 times
Reputation: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Over 55% of the US population already supports SSM. Why change tactics when we are already winning?
Really? Is that why your liberal bastion of California voted AGAINST allowing homosexual "marriage"?
Other states and their %'s that voted AGAINST homosexual "marriage"
North Carolina-61.04%
Hawaii-69%
Alaska-68%
Nevada-69 and 67% respectively they did it twice.
Mississippi-86%
Missouri-72%
Montana-67%
Oregon-57%
Colorado-56%
Tennessee-81%
Arizona-56%
Nebraska-70%
Arkansas-75%
Georgia-76%
Kentucky-75%
Louisiana-78%
North Dakota-73%
Ohio-62%
Kansas-70%
Texas-76%
Alabama-81%
Idaho-63%
South Carolina-78%
South Dakota-52%
Wisconsin-59%
Florida-62%
Michigan-59%
Virginia-57%
California-52%
Utah-66%
Oklahoma-76%

So as usual the citizens vote doesn't matter. We are slaves not citizens...only a slaves opinion doesn't matter...a citizens does.

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
When was the last revolution Texas started and how did it work out for them?
They split from Mexico and were an independent nation for a time.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:50 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,464,288 times
Reputation: 27720
Why are you bickering among yourselves about this ?

A court will decide what happens, not the people.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:50 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Now we get to the real issue. What if that happens and Texas refuses to comply? How far will the Federal Government push it? They have backed off of Colorado on the MJ law.
In 1967 the Supreme Court applied the 14th Amendment to Texas civil marriage law and ruled Texas' ban on interracial marriage to be unconstitutional. Texas' interracial marriage ban had much more popular support then that Texas' gay marriage ban does now.

If Texas didn't refuse to comply with an order of the Supreme Court over ending its practice of banning interracial marriage, I don't it see doing so over a much less contentious issue.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:50 AM
 
4,837 posts, read 4,166,858 times
Reputation: 1848
Quote:
Originally Posted by SocialistAtheist View Post
Really? Is that why your liberal bastion of California voted AGAINST allowing homosexual "marriage"?


So as usual the citizens vote doesn't matter. We are slaves not citizens...only a slaves opinion doesn't matter...a citizens does.


They split from Mexico and were an independent nation for a time.
Why do you care so much?
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:51 AM
 
3,555 posts, read 4,095,005 times
Reputation: 1632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bideshi View Post
Intended to grant citizenship to former slaves and nothing to do with gay marriage.
You cant be discriminated against due to gender. Gay marriage bans are by their definition discriminating because of the gender of one of the individuals.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:51 AM
 
14,917 posts, read 13,098,699 times
Reputation: 4828
Quote:
Originally Posted by SocialistAtheist View Post
Really? Is that why your liberal bastion of California voted AGAINST allowing homosexual "marriage"?
Yes, really.

You do realize that popular votes don't necessarily reflect the will and opinion of the people - and ESPECIALLY DON'T when an issue is generational.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:52 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,171,483 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by SocialistAtheist View Post

They split from Mexico and were an independent nation for a time.
So you had to go all the way back to 1835, nothing since then? And they failed at being an independent nation and joined their neighbors to the north.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:53 AM
 
7,413 posts, read 6,227,294 times
Reputation: 6665
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
In 1967, the Supreme Court applied the 14th Amendment to Texas civil marriage law and ruled Texas' ban on interracial marriage to be unconstitutional. Texas' interracial marriage ban had much more popular support then that Texas' gay marriage ban does now.

If Texas didn't refuse to comply with an order of the Supreme Court over ending its practice of banning interracial marriage, I don't it see doing so over a much less contentious issue.
#2 tactic from progressive liberal playbook: When losing an argument, falsely parallel the opponent's argument with racism.
 
Old 02-12-2014, 08:55 AM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,870,989 times
Reputation: 14345
Quote:
Originally Posted by SocialistAtheist View Post
Really? Is that why your liberal bastion of California voted AGAINST allowing homosexual "marriage"?
Other states and their %'s that voted AGAINST homosexual "marriage"
North Carolina-61.04%
Hawaii-69%
Alaska-68%
Nevada-69 and 67% respectively they did it twice.
Mississippi-86%
Missouri-72%
Montana-67%
Oregon-57%
Colorado-56%
Tennessee-81%
Arizona-56%
Nebraska-70%
Arkansas-75%
Georgia-76%
Kentucky-75%
Louisiana-78%
North Dakota-73%
Ohio-62%
Kansas-70%
Texas-76%
Alabama-81%
Idaho-63%
South Carolina-78%
South Dakota-52%
Wisconsin-59%
Florida-62%
Michigan-59%
Virginia-57%
California-52%
Utah-66%
Oklahoma-76%

So as usual the citizens vote doesn't matter. We are slaves not citizens...only a slaves opinion doesn't matter...a citizens does.


They split from Mexico and were an independent nation for a time.
Your opinion matters. It just doesn't trump the rights of others. Sorry.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top