Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:13 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by StillwaterTownie View Post
But what if the homosexual is a black person?
What does race have to do with this discussion?

 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:13 AM
 
27,142 posts, read 15,313,785 times
Reputation: 12071
Quote:
Originally Posted by ErikBEggs View Post
Freedom of religion means you may practice any religion you'd like as long as it does not infringe on the rights of others. Using religion as a justification to infringe on the rights of gays is not what is included in the First Amendment, nor is the First Amendment applicable in that defense.


No one has a right to a cake.
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:21 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
In all states?

Cite the statutes.
here you go

Depraved Indifference Law & Legal Definition
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:22 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6038
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluesjuke View Post
No one has a right to a cake.
You have the right to happiness, so yea, technically you do as long as you

1. Pay for it

2. come in during business hours.
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:29 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Well, if you aren't talking about constitutionality then you are in the wrong thread, because the constitution is what this thread is about.

Religious freedom is guaranteed under the 1st Amendment.

The Colorado law concerning the baker violated the baker's First Amendment rights.

Any argument that you make that supports that law must be constitutionally based.
You need to prove it is about religious freedom to make that argument, you still havent.

That is why im asking for the verse that says it is biblical wrong to serve gay people.

Constitutionality comes after you have verify your claim or of religion.
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:32 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You have the right to happiness, so yea, technically you do as long as you

1. Pay for it

2. come in during business hours.
Why would anyone feel happy forcing someone to bake a cake for them when the baker has moral qualms about doing so and is being forced to act against their conscience?
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:35 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You need to prove it is about religious freedom to make that argument, you still havent.

That is why im asking for the verse that says it is biblical wrong to serve gay people.

Constitutionality comes after you have verify your claim or of religion.
Harrier already quoted the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.

Instead of reverting to the Bible, which is irrelevant to this discussion (because we are talking about public policy in the United States of America - where the U.S. Constitution is the ultimate authority), you need to cite the part of the U.S. Constitution that requires a person to serve someone contrary to their conscience.

You have not done so.
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:43 AM
 
2,003 posts, read 1,545,462 times
Reputation: 1102
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Is this now obsolete? We see now religious organizations compelled to comply with the tenor of the times. Don't want to bake a cake for a gay wedding--you're sued. Don't want to supply birth control to your students--you're sued again--and get a dressing-down from the POTUS.

Do libs support or reject the free exercise of religion?
I don't know of any religious organizations that commercially bake cakes, or distribute pharmaceuticals, to the public. You're actually referring to bakeries, health insurance companies, and drug stores, respectively, and as for-profit businesses, they should not be allowed this sort of discrimination. Now, if a priest refuses to marry any couple, or to baptize someone, or whatever, for whatever reason, then that's fine. But Hobby Lobby is not a religious organization, and frankly, the deal they've been offered on contraceptives is overly generous as is.
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:48 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 22 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,551 posts, read 16,539,320 times
Reputation: 6038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Harrier already quoted the free exercise clause of the First Amendment.

Instead of reverting to the Bible, which is irrelevant to this discussion (because we are talking about public policy in the United States of America - where the U.S. Constitution is the ultimate authority), you need to cite the part of the U.S. Constitution that requires a person to serve someone contrary to their conscience.

You have not done so.
You are continuing to put the cart before the horse, you have still not shown where this is religious and further more, by not doing that, you have also not shown where his religious freedom was violated.

Constitutionality when it comes to religious freedom does not matter until you show that this is about religious freedom.

THis isnt about conscience, you specifically said religion, so back it up
 
Old 03-11-2014, 12:58 AM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,005,925 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
THis isnt about conscience, you specifically said religion, so back it up
Religious principle is a matter of conscience - and the First Amendment protects religious freedom.

Stop dodging the question.

What part of the constitution requires a person to serve another person contrary to their conscience and religious principles?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top