Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
And how does either link pertain to Benghazi?
They don't. At all. This is just dumb deflection. Benghazi is a loser as an issue. Pursuing Benghazi can turn all those favorable polls for the Repubs on their head in a second and a half.
By the way, lose is spelled with one o. Loose is an entirely different word. Know the difference.
This is one of the weirdest spins I have ever seen.
All of the men killed in Benghazi were there voluntarily, fully aware that it was dangerous duty, and none of them was younger than 34.
Children?
Please.
Yes children. I have 2 daughters, both are grown, on their own, but they are still MY children. When you at 60, lose your 35 year old son, because of a situation that could have been prevented, dangerous or not, you will realize, that it wasn't weird, nor was it a spin.
Yes children. I have 2 daughters, both are grown, on their own, but they are still MY children. When you at 60, lose your 35 year old son, because of a situation that could have been prevented, dangerous or not, you will realize, that it wasn't weird, nor was it a spin.
Very well communicated. And so true. No parent in this world wants to lose a child before themselves. I know many friends who have lost children before themselves. And you never can bring yourself to understand why, no matter how they died. This case, BS did not have to happen and Period.
No spin, dead is dead, and these souls went way before their time. And your children are always your babys, I know, but they are.
I'd expect Republicans to claim nothing other than that. They're really good at making things up.
In any case, pointing it out pretty much ends the whole Benghazi discussion with all but the most rabid Obamaphobes. But in their case, nothing will ever register with them. They're still on the birther bandwagon, too.
During the first week of testimony from the congressional hearing, a woman from the State Department was asked if lack of security was in any way connected to lack of funding, and she said "No" not 'maybe,' not 'might have been,' she flat out said 'NO.'
I don't see anyone saying the deaths were "phony." What's phony is the insincerity of the Anti-Americans who have so little concern for the lost lives, and who think they can gain political capital by working so hard, and so unsuccessfully, to create an scandal/issue where there is none. Care about the lost lives? Then those who say they do should show it.
I don't see anyone saying the deaths were "phony." What's phony is the insincerity of the Anti-Americans who have so little concern for the lost lives, and who think they can gain political capital by working so hard, and so unsuccessfully, to create an scandal/issue where there is none. Care about the lost lives? Then those who say they do should show it.
The deaths are the scandal how and why did they have to die?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
