Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 09-01-2014, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,141,538 times
Reputation: 2677

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by caribdoll View Post
People with any semblence of morality have a general respect for other human beings. Further, it is a sign of backward culture to feel it is acceptable to disrespect a man's wife.

Respect is earned. Honesty is appreciated. Trust is gained. Loyalty is returned. A semblance of any of those out of most people now days would be a welcome surprise....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-01-2014, 01:09 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,178,048 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by caribdoll View Post
People with any semblence of morality have a general respect for other human beings.
Which would include not telling others how to raise their kids.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 02:37 PM
 
Location: Meggett, SC
11,011 posts, read 11,020,453 times
Reputation: 6192
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrs. Skeffington View Post
We didn't use any government funds to bake our cookies - they were very profitable and paid for themselves. We also made large special occasion cookies to order (several racks of them on Valentine's Day, for example). Also the kids...as well as the teachers and administration...ordered specially made birthday cookies for friends. They weren't free. They had to pay for them.

Now we are not allowed to make them at all.
The understanding is the same at my daughter's old school. Even though the funds were not government, the school is forbidden now from selling any a la carte food items that aren't part of the federal lunch program. It's quite sad, really, because the culinary classes will continue to make the food since it is part of the curriculum, but now, instead of benefiting from their efforts, the school will simply lose that fundraising opportunity as well as the ability for that program to be self-funding. The culinary classes used to make enough to pay for all of their supplies and use the excess for fundraising for the school. Not to mention the wasted food. It's the issue when the government takes a one size fit all approach to everything. There are nuances which are lost in such an approach.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Yes you are. You have chosen to not make them. Make them, sell them, no one is going to do a thing about it.
If it's on school property, there is. Basically, any food made or sold on school property becomes the purview of the Federal government under these new rules. Most schools used a la carte programs as a supplement to the school's budget. The lunch provided, as the regular lunch, was within the new guidelines but now they've forbidden anything else from being sold. These schools are trying to offer the most they can to the students on a budget that doesn't allow them the 'extras' such as arts, field trips, etc, etc. This was a profitable means of allowing the schools to offer those additional programs since the budget cut them long ago. Sad really.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 06:04 PM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,169,435 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
Which would include not telling others how to raise their kids.
No one is telling anyone how to raise their children. Grow up and stop whining. All of this over a cookie? Seriously?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 06:08 PM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,169,435 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by aus10 View Post
Respect is earned. Honesty is appreciated. Trust is gained. Loyalty is returned. A semblance of any of those out of most people now days would be a welcome surprise....
Again, if people had any morals, they would not be disrespecting a man's wife. They are sick and have no respect for the marital relationship.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 06:09 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,178,048 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by southbel View Post

If it's on school property, there is. Basically, any food made or sold on school property becomes the purview of the Federal government under these new rules.
Are they going to send in federal agents to arrest the lunch ladies? If people simply said "no" all of this would go away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 06:10 PM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,178,048 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by caribdoll View Post
No one is telling anyone how to raise their children. Grow up and stop whining. All of this over a cookie? Seriously?
If only it was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Illinois
2,430 posts, read 2,766,886 times
Reputation: 336
Default Is that the first lady?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cruxan View Post
"do as I say", "not as I do"!!!
She looks OK. What does she eat?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 06:43 PM
 
15,063 posts, read 6,169,435 times
Reputation: 5124
Quote:
Originally Posted by pknopp View Post
If only it was.
Oh of course it isnt...smh.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-01-2014, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Just transplanted to FL from the N GA mountains
3,997 posts, read 4,141,538 times
Reputation: 2677
Quote:
Originally Posted by caribdoll View Post
Again, if people had any morals, they would not be disrespecting a man's wife. They are sick and have no respect for the marital relationship.
I'm sorry, but that thinking is archaic. I do not expect someone to respect me just because I'm married. I would hope that they judge me for me. As a woman, I especially have the right to judge the First Lady. I do not judge her on her husband's performance. I judge her on her own behavior and words.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top