Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If this was about privacy I would care. Otherwise this utter fail for our court systems. Marraige is about religious structure. Not law. Non-heterosexuals ( especailly the GayKK-K ) wants to gain rights to save money; and taxes dodges. Only a few of non-heterosexual types are even doing this for love at all. Most are just out "hunting money". and benifits. Those are victims of the grand prymid scheme of these activities.
If this was about privacy I would care. Otherwise this utter fail for our court systems. Marraige is about religious structure. Not law.
Civil marriage is an entirely legal/civil institution that has nothing whatsoever to do with religion.
Quote:
Non-heterosexuals ( especailly the GayKK-K ) wants to gain rights to save money; and taxes dodges. Only a few of non-heterosexual types are even doing this for love at all. Most are just out "hunting money". and benifits. Those are victims of the grand prymid scheme of these activities.
Im glad to see that equality is becoming more and more prevalent for more American couples.
If we want to stop gay marriage by the state, then heterosexual marriage should not be allowed. All 'marriages' should be classified as civil unions.
If this was about privacy I would care. Otherwise this utter fail for our court systems. Marraige is about religious structure. Not law. Non-heterosexuals ( especailly the GayKK-K ) wants to gain rights to save money; and taxes dodges. Only a few of non-heterosexual types are even doing this for love at all. Most are just out "hunting money". and benifits. Those are victims of the grand prymid scheme of these activities.
Hate to be a bearer of bad news, but there really are not a lot tax benefits for SSM. I ran the figures on federal tax, and it virtually unchanged. We also ran the effects by our lawyer etc.
We will have to include both our incomes regarding homestead exemptions in our state, when our state gets around to accepting our status. In our case, my husband cannot collect on my SS, he is under the "old civil service" rules, without having a dollar for dollar reduction from his pension. We can no longer "shelter" assets from a law suit against the other.
Next, generally any debt that we take on now becomes "community" property. When we kept things separate we could have let the bills go unpaid and shuffled assets to the non-delinquent person.
We were together for almost 40 years, before we got married in August 2014 in New York. For us to go out of state was not an issue. Hubby is retired and I'm working less than fulltime. We did marry for love and every other couple we know is waiting for our state to get its collective self-righteous head out of its ass as they are also couple of multiple decades.
If this was about privacy I would care. Otherwise this utter fail for our court systems. Marraige is about religious structure. Not law. Non-heterosexuals ( especailly the GayKK-K ) wants to gain rights to save money; and taxes dodges. Only a few of non-heterosexual types are even doing this for love at all. Most are just out "hunting money". and benifits. Those are victims of the grand prymid scheme of these activities.
Do you realize how silly that post makes you look? I'm glad gay marriage upsets you, you deserve it.
I'm am so glad to hear about the good news for Mississippi and good news for one of my favorite folks on CD, jjrose!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.