Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The more I think on this the more I have to think Cavuto pretty sleazy. I've not watched him in a long time but I always thought him a fair guy. What he did here was put Rhonda Rousy in the ring with a young untrained girl way out of her element and then crow about doing something special because the young girl was beat.
Cavuto is polished, experienced and comfortable behind the camera. And who does he pick to discuss this with? A young woman with little to no experience in the spotlight.
Is this really what people are applauding? This was fair?
She was the leader of the movement so the choice to interview her seemed logical. I actually thought he was quite kind to her considering some of the things she said. He could have been a jerk but instead was trying to make her see how perhaps she needed to think through this issue a bit deeper.
Ah but she has a progressive upbringing and education.
She is the leader of this movement. Don't organize a national movement when you don't have all the answers !!!
Her father is right their with her in this movement.
A leader? Have you ever heard of her before? No, me either. Cavuto beat up on a young women. Yipee.
The more I think on this the more I have to think Cavuto pretty sleazy. I've not watched him in a long time but I always thought him a fair guy. What he did here was put Rhonda Rousy in the ring with a young untrained girl way out of her element and then crow about doing something special because the young girl was beat.
Cavuto is polished, experienced and comfortable behind the camera. And who does he pick to discuss this with? A young woman with little to no experience in the spotlight.
Is this really what people are applauding? This was fair?
I partially agree, because they knew she would be outmatched...BUT this is serious business. If you're a spokesperson for a group that wants other people's money taken by force and given to you, you better have good reasoning behind that. It was revealed that she doesn't, and although she may have been embarrassed, I think it should be that way.
She was the leader of the movement so the choice to interview her seemed logical. I actually thought he was quite kind to her considering some of the things she said. He could have been a jerk but instead was trying to make her see how perhaps she needed to think through this issue a bit deeper.
She is a young inexperienced college student. It was hardly a fair debate of the subject.
I partially agree, because they knew she would be outmatched...BUT this is serious business. If you're a spokesperson for a group that wants other people's money taken by force and given to you, you better have good reasoning behind that. It was revealed that she doesn't.
Timmy Geithner didn't but yet we listened to him. He got his though didn't he?
The tragedy here is that Keely is forking out $45,000 per year in tuition to go to Northeastern (Boston) and for some inexplicable reason, still completely lacks critical thinking skills.
First you argue that she's inexperienced and then go on to compare her to Tim Geithner ?
Yeah, both had something they wanted but for some reason only one got it.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
