A few hundred dead here or there-price of liberal "multiculturalism" (enemies, weapons)

[mtl1]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

You make a lot of generalizing assumptions it seems....but it is good to see you doubling down on fascism, you would fit in well in a Fascist Regime.

Now the liberal labeling.

[urbanlife78]

Originally Posted by mtl1

We don't get to pick which arms we allow into this country, grenades machine guns etc, they are all arms.

Maybe we should be able to, you don't support restricting the Constitution do you?

[HappyTexan]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

That doesn't mean ALL Muslims are killing people who are "non believers." The Bible is full of archaic things that most people don't pay attention to, the same goes for Muslims.

So I ask you a question and you deflect to the Bible.

[urbanlife78]

Originally Posted by HappyTexan

So I ask you a question and you deflect to the Bible.

Oh, sorry, I thought my answer to your question was clear. No, is my answer.

[mtl1]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

Islam is as old as Jewish and Christian religions.

Islam 640 ad, Christianity 42 ad, Judaism ~1000 bc. The Roman empire and Europe was Christian for 300 years before Islam even existed. Islam conquered christanity outside of Europe.

[Robeaux]

Originally Posted by hawkeye2009

Fascist regime?

So protecting our borders and seeking to only grant immigration status to others who will not kill us and will not perpetually be on welfare is "fascist"?

This clearly shows the lunacy of the left.

BTW- how many Syrians are you taking into your home? If the answer is "none", you are simply hypocritical and want to expose others to risks you will not assume yourself. This, however, is typical of liberals, who are long on "want", but short on action.

We call this, "all hat and no cattle".

You won the Internet today with that one.

[VTHokieFan]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

That doesn't mean ALL Muslims are killing people who are "non believers." The Bible is full of archaic things that most people don't pay attention to, the same goes for Muslims.

The difference between the Bible and the Koran is that the Bible has context.

[mtl1]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

Maybe we should be able to, you don't support restricting the Constitution do you?

We do restrict the 2nd amendment. That's my point. So you support restricting the 2nd amendment but not restricting freedom of religion? You're the one committing a logical inconsistency.

[urbanlife78]

Originally Posted by mtl1

Islam 640 ad, Christianity 42 ad, Judaism ~1000 bc. The Roman empire and Europe was Christian for 300 years before Islam even existed. Islam conquered christanity outside of Europe.

That sounds like three very old religions.

[urbanlife78]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

The difference between the Bible and the Koran is that the Bible has context.

The Bible is full of fictional stories and stupid rules, much like the Koran.