Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-10-2016, 04:13 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11132

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
You guys simply don't seem to get it. The Secretary of State is not a grunt. The Secretary is not bound by grunt regulations.

Talking points for instance are certainly an internal State Dept document and can be classified anyway the SofS wishes. The decision to send them non secure is well within the Authority of the SofS
Show us the difference in the law between grunts and anyone above them...go ahead, I'll wait....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-10-2016, 04:46 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Show us the difference in the law between grunts and anyone above them...go ahead, I'll wait....
Read the EOs. See where it says Department Heads and Designees? That is those who are NOT Grunts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 05:01 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11132
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
Read the EOs. See where it says Department Heads and Designees? That is those who are NOT Grunts.



No, you show me the exact EO's you are speaking of. This way I can read exactly what you are speaking of. Can you do this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 05:07 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
No, you show me the exact EO's you are speaking of. This way I can read exactly what you are speaking of. Can you do this?
Been in this discussion a couple of times. Look it up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 05:12 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11132
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/upl...C-SCI-NDA1.pdf

Read this and then get back with us......

Don't like it, prove it wrong.

Looks pretty damn close to what I signed, and in your eyes, I would be a grunt....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 05:13 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11132
Quote:
Originally Posted by lvoc View Post
Been in this discussion a couple of times. Look it up.
Not gonna go back through, either back up your blather or just say you told a fib....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 05:17 PM
 
46,302 posts, read 27,117,053 times
Reputation: 11132
Here is an EO:

Quote:
“Under this executive order, 13526, signed by Mr. Obama in December 2009, only the three intelligence agencies who own that information in the first place have the authority to declassify it, not Mrs. Clinton and not the State Department,” Herridge said.
Glad I looked it up.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-10-2016, 06:24 PM
 
12,973 posts, read 15,807,980 times
Reputation: 5478
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
http://freebeacon.com/wp-content/upl...C-SCI-NDA1.pdf

Read this and then get back with us......

Don't like it, prove it wrong.

Looks pretty damn close to what I signed, and in your eyes, I would be a grunt....
Read it again...and slowly this time. Exactly whose permission does the SofS need to disclose SCI? Why the permission of the SofS.

That is why she is not a grunt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 06:47 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,550,307 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Well, what you have done is this thread is show that clinton supporters will go to any lengths to support her, even if they have no clue what they are talking about.....
Your anger clouds your thinking and reading. I'm no fan of the Clintons as I've repeatedly stated here. What I've said time and again is this:

Present the evidence.

Press charges.

Take her to trial.

If convicted, sentence her.

The angry irrational haters are a chorus singing the same song: "She's a witch! Burn her!"

That's not how it works in America.

FYI

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-11-2016, 06:51 AM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,550,307 times
Reputation: 24780
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
Glad you are not up to date and willing to admit it.

But your quote could be taken very wrong, lets see:



The quote above implies you still have a TS....
You read things to feed your bias, is what that shows.

Quote:
Yes, done. She had her own server and even the state department says she had classified information on it....what would happen to you, if you took even a lap top home and did, lets say what the 4 star did....

You are tying to skirt the question, what would happen to you, not her.
I never responded to any silly questions about "what would happen to me."

If Hill has done what the haters accuse her of, then hold a trial, etc.

Blabbering endlessly about what might have happened and what could happen is fantasy.

Let's see what does happen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top