Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If that is so, why was there a SPECIFIC law written for abortion clinics?
Oh, and by the way, I'm still waiting for your proof that 'MDs are in all state legislatures'.
She won't provide it, because it's not true, and she also can't guarantee that all doctors see the issue as she does, which would undermine her argument.
"Doc" Anderson from the Texas State Legislature is a vet.
Perhaps you can explain why a facility performing surgical abortions on an outpatient basis shouldn't have to meet the same requirements.
Are you yet another who thinks it's OK that women are discriminated against and treated as 2nd class citizens when it comes to their gender-specific health care needs?
Like I said... ambulatory surgery. The SCOTUS ruling violates the equal protection clause.
Why a special law for abortion centers? Why weren't they included with all the other ambulatory surgery centers?
I already posted the link to the laws regulating ambulatory surgery centers.
And that law hasn't gone anywhere.
What you fail to comprehend is that the law that the Supreme Court ruled on was a law targeting specifically and ONLY abortion centers. And the law didn't raise the standards for other clinics that performed similar services (colonscopies, for example), and therefore it was not an equal and impartial application of the law.
What you fail to comprehend is that the law that the Supreme Court ruled on was a law targeting specifically and ONLY abortion centers. And the law didn't raise the standards for other clinics that performed similar services (colonscopies, for example), and therefore it was not an equal and impartial application of the law.
Where does the the Constitution concern itself with the equal rights of medial procedures?
It's unconstitutional to write laws ensuring better health care for one medical procedure, and not addressing all medical procedures simultaneously?
The Constitution says it's illegal to address medical procedures in a peace meal fashion? Because you have to write laws for all medical procedures, at the same time?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
