Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It doesn't. It concerns itself with the equal rights of the citizens of the United States. If a law's purpose is to restrict access to medical procedures that are enjoyed only by women, then the law is restricting the rights of women versus the general population.
Actually, I think you could argue that abortion is a medical procedure that is enjoyed by more men than women.
It doesn't. It concerns itself with the equal rights of the citizens of the United States. If a law's purpose is to restrict access to medical procedures that are enjoyed only by women, then the law is restricting the rights of women versus the general population.
I found Justice Thomas's opinion rather interesting, implying that the courts were going out of their way to defend abortion clinics. starts on page 47
The solution for conservatives is a vasectomy for all males at birth. With advanced technology, the procedure may be reversed at an appropriate age.
Why continue to waste more time and money trying to punish women?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
