Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sure he has purposely changed his signature over the years. Great way to cover your tracks. How about a link showing these signatures? These Al newspapers know a lot moore of what is true than you do.
Sure he has purposely changed his signature over the years. Great way to cover your tracks. How about a link showing these signatures? These Al newspapers know a lot moore of what is true than you do.
Al.com has pushed the notion he was banned at the mall despite the mall manager in early 80s saying he wasn't banned at the mall. I think it is makes more sense to go with the mall manager than people who were not the mall manager.
If you want Roy to testify under oath, it makes sense you pursue this in court, rather than trial in the media.
Most likely, these women disappear once the election is over. That is how it is usually works with Glorida Allred's accusers against Republican candidates.
Roy Moore stated over a week ago he was going to sue WaPo. Great opportunity to clear his name.
Has Moore filed the lawsuit against WaPo as he promised to do? What is he waiting for or is it just another fib by Roy Moore?
If Moore was banned at the mall, it seems like he would have been informed of that.
So we are supposed to believe that Moore ran for political office despite being banned at a mall.
If you were banned at a mall, would you run for political office? It seems like he would have been worried about that being made public. Again,people say it is common knowledge he was banned yet no political opponent ever mentioned that in his 5 campaigns. That doesn't make any sense.
One of their dishonest things is to make it seem like there are multiple women accusing him of preying on them when they were underage when there are only two such accusations.
two is still multiple. they'd have a hard time proving slander there.
Al.com used the expression '5th accuser' as though there were 5 accusations of sexual misconduct.
Did you even read Moore's lawyer's letter to Al.com?
As many people have pointed out, WaPo lumped in 3 consensual dates with of age girls with one allegation of sexual misconduct with a minor. They did this to give the impression of a larger number of sexual misconduct claims. It is political.
So where is that lawsuit against the Washington Post?
Did Moore file it today?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
