Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If that were true, then why didn't she come out and identify her handwriting upfront and claim it further proves the yearbook's authenticity? Your "double-secret probation"-ish conspiracy theory makes about as much sense as your previous accusation that Hillary Clinton set up the Russia meeting in Trump Tower to entrap the Trump family but then never bothered to raise the meeting during the election.
Whatever. She needs to let it be analyzed but she won't because she knows it's fake, this woman is as dumb as dumb gets and got herself caught end of story.
Because it is Obvious that is not part of his signature and note. Clearly, so she would have to be a complete idiot to say that was all one thing. I would have to hear her specifically say he wrote that other part in order to believe she ever tried to pass it off as such. If she is that stupid she has no credibility at all. I don't buy it. I think it is being spun right now as something it is not.
I always thought it was obvious the date and location were added and not the same handwriting. However, many posters fought that and said it looked legit. Easy now, after she admits to it to say it was obvious. Go back and check all the defenders saying it looked the same.
They should just do it to establish legitimacy, then demand for a hearing or investigation once it is validated.
Why does she need to establish legitimacy? Moore threatened to sue her for defamation but apparently thought better of it after realizing he would likely be proved a liar. Otherwise we'd see a lawsuit by now.
If he wrote the first part then let them do an analysis on the part that he was supposed to have written. Why not?
SHE WON'T GIVE THE BOOK UP FOR ANALYSYS! Why not? She just wants you to believe it's true without verification. NOBODY does that if what they are saying is true.
SHE WON'T GIVE THE BOOK UP FOR ANALYSYS! Why not? She just wants you to believe it's true without verification. NOBODY does that if what they are saying is true.
She said she would give up the book for analysis. Moore's people want the book given to them for their own "expert" analysis.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
