Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
A friend had this to say, and I must agree with it: "Trust me ... if it will disqualify a pro life politician’s run for office, a political party that supports aborting 3,000 babies a day — has no problem falsely accusing said politician of sexual harassment."
A friend had this to say, and I must agree with it: "Trust me ... if it will disqualify a pro life politician’s run for office, a political party that supports aborting 3,000 babies a day — has no problem falsely accusing said politician of sexual harassment."
If you had bothered to take your index finger and press on the blue link, it would have taken you right to the article. There is no charge. Frankly, I am very disappointed in your response.
These bible thumpers are still caught in the 200 BC mindset when 14 years old was considered a woman.
Yup. And an old man was 39.
The Bible says nothing about Joseph's age; only that he was much older. In actual life, Joseph could have been 18 or 19 and be considered 'much older', and Mary could have been 12 or 13.
It's just more hypocrisy in action. Moore was a short-eyes who had a thing for young teens, period. Supporting him with Biblical quotation is only supporting a perv because he agrees with your beliefs.
It will be an interesting election. I'm not real sure ever the most religious women will want to vote for a child molester, even if he's as religious. And there are lots of fathers who would not, either.
The Bible says nothing about Joseph's age; only that he was much older. In actual life, Joseph could have been 18 or 19 and be considered 'much older', and Mary could have been 12 or 13.
It's just more hypocrisy in action. Moore was a short-eyes who had a thing for young teens, period. Supporting him with Biblical quotation is only supporting a perv because he agrees with your beliefs.
It will be an interesting election. I'm not real sure ever the most religious women will want to vote for a child molester, even if he's as religious. And there are lots of fathers who would not, either.
Yeah, I though no one would vote for a man who sexually assaults women, but they surprised me.
It is incredibly sad seeing conservatives twisting themselves to defend a man who is so obviously sick in the head. If these allegations were true, it would still be acceptable to you because...politics. A 32 year old man undressing a 14 year old, barely a teenager, kissing her, taking advantage of her. You are ok with this because of politics.
Thanks for showing everyone your true colors, every one of you who claimed it is ok. Sick.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
