Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Did you read the part where they deleted some of Farrakhan's content? If Farrakhan reposts it using a different channel like Alex Jones did we will see if he gets banned like Jones.
Sure, but don't tell me that some website is unfairly biased unless you have evidence of unfair bias.
Anywhere and everywhere there is bias. Human beings are biased. Every human being has opinions and preferences. When human beings make judgments, those judgments reflect to some degree their bias. The fact is that a ban on one of these websites isn't just the judgment of one person. People have complained to these companies. Different people at different levels have reviewed the complaints and the content in question. Jones was given notice that some of his posts violated the terms of service. THEN he tried to get around that, and that's when he was banned.
Anywhere and everywhere there is bias. Human beings are biased. Every human being has opinions and preferences. When human beings make judgments, those judgments reflect to some degree their bias. The fact is that a ban on one of these websites isn't just the judgment of one person. People have complained to these companies. Different people at different levels have reviewed the complaints and the content in question. Jones was given notice that some of his posts violated the terms of service. THEN he tried to get around that, and that's when he was banned.
I fully agree but the issue today is people want the content they read to have the same bias they do.
These companies have freedom of speech. You are recommending that their freedom be taken away, and that they be compelled to throw away their terms of service. The simple fact of the matter is that Congress can take the action you are recommending, but the courts will void it. The rights of Mr Jones do not outweigh the rights of everyone else.
That is the exact argument that was shot down during the civil rights acts, passage.
Last edited by 4dognight; 08-13-2018 at 06:54 PM..
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
