Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
That hearing was not conducted in a manner that the FBI would interview someone.
Since you seem to be knowledgeable about this, exactly what manner would the FBI do, and how would it extract more information that what they already said?
Dems last week... "We demand an FBI investigation!"
Republicans... "Fine"
Dems this week... "This investigation is crap"
Dems last week... We should have an FBI investigation so we have the facts.
Repubs.... Okay but only interview those without involvement and it can only last a few days.
Dems...That is no an investigation, it is a sham investigation.
BTW, if McConnel doesn't have the votes to confirm because senators are not impressed by this sham of an investigation, don't blame the democrats for the delay.
The IRS has a policy of levying penalty or criminal charges against those who file "frivolous tax returns." Is there such a policy for the 123,876,456 democrat activists who have now come forward and accused the judge of being a serial rapist who belonged to a club that lined up behind a drunk, bound woman and "took turns"? Is there no penalty for absolute stupid nonsense accusations like that?
As for the OP, believe me, you'd have heard by now if the FBI had any pay dirt.
It seems it is time for a new direction for the left; this ore vein has petered out just like the last one hundred have. I think it's time to shut your mining operation down. It is digging up absolutely nothing besides fool's gold.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.