Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How many votes will Brett Kavanaugh get for confirmation in the Senate?
61 or more 14 6.25%
58-60 7 3.13%
55-57 13 5.80%
50-54 144 64.29%
49 or less 46 20.54%
Voters: 224. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 10-01-2018, 11:55 AM
 
Location: minnesota
15,853 posts, read 6,311,569 times
Reputation: 5056

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
wow you are struggling badly mate. If that is the best you guys can make up, then she is clean as a whistle.


You see if you had anything real, you would post it, but this is all you got, some made up nonsense . thus you guys are reduced to extreme fringe sites and fan fiction.
The closest I can find for a source to this story is a 4chan prank. I've seen FB pranks used like a gay porn star was once the subject of a meme about what a real Christian male was.

 
Old 10-01-2018, 11:57 AM
 
17,441 posts, read 9,263,686 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
I'm pretty much in agreement, except I don't think FBI clearance should equal an instant confirmation.

I do still think Congress may want to consider his behavior during this process.

He should have stepped down instead of creating this level of disturbance with his testimony.

Better yet, Trump should have pulled his name and put his other candidate up, because I know one has been vetted already.
Good of you to admit that the FBI report will be meaningless to you if they don't Tar & Feather Judge Kavanaugh. The Senate still gets to "consider all they want" right before the Floor vote is called.

I'm aware the entire Leftist Plan was to get Judge Kavanaugh to cave in and withdraw.
I'm also aware that the Leftists really thought they Media Feeding Frenzy would frighten the Republicans into giving in to their pressure ..... so that the Republicans (led by Flake) would demand that President Trump withdraw the Nomination for Kavanaugh.

What the Left doesn't understand is that they went way, way over the Line with their Nasty Ugly unsubstantiated accusations and bizarre non-stop coverage of "attempted rape", "rape survivor", "child sex abuser", "gang rape", "drugging". They went so far over the Line that Judge Kavanaugh had ZERO choice about fighting back. He couldn't quit -- his life work, his reputation, attacks on his family, his JOB as a Federal Judge, his Law License ...... all gone if he gives in to this extraordinary attack by a coordinated effort between #Resistance-Leftists-Democrats-Media Lap Dogs-Soros Funded Organizations and the Democratic Members of the Senate Judicial Committee.

NOBODY is going to forget this - Most particularly Senator Lindsey Graham, who is expected to Chair this Committee next year. Quite a Legacy Feinstein and her merry gang are leaving the SJC.

On the UP side -- they threw everything but the kitchen sink at Kavanaugh, when they really needed to hold their fire for the NEXT Justice Nomination. Normal People will remember.
 
Old 10-01-2018, 11:58 AM
 
Location: Atlanta, GA
14,834 posts, read 7,409,298 times
Reputation: 8966
Quote:
Originally Posted by adelphi_sky View Post
Not when people hype the importance of this nomination so much that they are willing to sacrifice themselves for it. History is full of martyrs.
Such a sacrifice would be close to meaningless. If Kav is derailed the chances are still pretty high another conservative judge will be confirmed.
 
Old 10-01-2018, 11:59 AM
 
Location: In the desert
4,049 posts, read 2,740,667 times
Reputation: 2483
Quote:
Originally Posted by chucksnee View Post
So, you want RBG to step down also, yes?


She has stated publically that she does not like our current president and oh BTW, she stated she was not 100% sober while at the SOTU address....


Anything other than a yes proves you're a hypocrite.....
If a supreme court judge cannot remain impartial then Yes they should step down.

BTW you should keep YOUR emotions in check . No need to call one a hypocrite until you know the truth.
 
Old 10-01-2018, 12:01 PM
 
16,551 posts, read 8,592,152 times
Reputation: 19393
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneyard1962 View Post
To be honest I am no fan of Kavanaugh, but the Dems have been so obviously wrong on this one I almost want Kavanaiugh to be picked for that reason alone.
You are not alone, as several liberals I know, think this was a stupid move for the Democrats to go so low and negative.
It is clear to just about anyone that 35+ year old uncorroborated accusation of groping at this specific point in time, is a pre-planed smear.
They may not want conservatives on any federal court because of their ideology, but fair is fair.
Many an ultra-left jurist has been approved by the Republicans (Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan and the "wise latina") but never were put through this despicable "intergalactic freak show".



`
 
Old 10-01-2018, 12:02 PM
 
Location: It's in the name!
7,083 posts, read 9,565,694 times
Reputation: 3780
Quote:
Originally Posted by RedZin View Post
Because you don't accuse women who say they've been molested of lying, unless you have direct evidence that they lied.

Nobody has direct evidence that she lied.

It's pretty damned heartless to accuse someone who may have been sexually assaulted or raped of LYING.

Come on.
And you don't accuse men who say they didn't molest someone of lying unless you have direct evidence that they lied. The important part missing is the evidence.

Nobody has direct evidence that Kavanaugh lied either.

It is also heartless to publicly accuse someone of sexually assaulting someone and to say they are lying with NO EVIDENCE.

Men are people too. They can be victims too.
 
Old 10-01-2018, 12:04 PM
 
46,274 posts, read 27,082,117 times
Reputation: 11119
Quote:
Originally Posted by sindey View Post
If a supreme court judge cannot remain impartial then Yes they should step down.

BTW you should keep YOUR emotions in check . No need to call one a hypocrite until you know the truth.

My emotions are in check, your research is not.


The truth is already there, she even apologized for saying what she did say.


She was also not 100% sober during the SOTU....(her own words)
 
Old 10-01-2018, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles
1,715 posts, read 2,836,614 times
Reputation: 1514
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilcart View Post
wow you are struggling badly mate. If that is the best you guys can make up, then she is clean as a whistle.


You see if you had anything real, you would post it, but this is all you got, some made up nonsense . thus you guys are reduced to extreme fringe sites and fan fiction.



And of course bringing up a victim's past sexual history, true or not, was deemed inadmissible in court decades ago.
 
Old 10-01-2018, 12:05 PM
 
21,915 posts, read 9,488,758 times
Reputation: 19448
Quote:
Originally Posted by adelphi_sky View Post
And you don't accuse men who say they didn't molest someone of lying unless you have direct evidence that they lied. The important part missing is the evidence.

Nobody has direct evidence that Kavanaugh lied either.

It is also heartless to publicly accuse someone of sexually assaulting someone and to say they are lying with NO EVIDENCE.

Men are people too. They can be victims too.
Liberals just go around repeating lies and assume everyone believes it. Other liberals believe it. Remember when Harry Reid said Romney paid not taxes and then admitted it was a lie after the election. There is no low to which they will not sink to win and people are starting to see it.
 
Old 10-01-2018, 12:08 PM
 
11,186 posts, read 6,503,406 times
Reputation: 4622
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That isn't really believable. Her best friend, who Ford said was there, already submitted a statement under penalty of perjury that she didn't know BK. How would Ford know him but her best friend did not if they were at the same house party with just a few people?
She identified one other male who she claims was at the supposed party. He too denies any knowledge of the party.

Though she doesn't remember when or where it was, how she got there or home, she does remember she had one beer. Not two beers or no beer, but one beer. That's darn good recollection of a pretty minor detail
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top