Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Are you happy with Trump’s deal to reopen the Federal government for 3 weeks?
I’m happy with the deal 41 36.61%
It’s ok 50 44.64%
I’m unhappy with this deal 21 18.75%
Voters: 112. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:33 PM
 
62,982 posts, read 29,170,163 times
Reputation: 18600

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by oceangaia View Post
Seriously? Why must you lie? Is your username pronounced "TEP Lie to Me"?


Lie #1. Overwhelming? In recent years, overstays have exceeded illegal crossings by a few percentage points while the overall illegal population remains mostly illegal crossers. There is no "overwhelming" here in any direction.
"In 2014, about 4.5 million US residents, or 42 percent of the total undocumented population, were overstays." Note this is from an anti-wall source. The 2,000 Mile Wall in Search of a Purpose: Since 2007 Visa Overstays have Outnumbered Undocumented Border Crossers by a Half Million - The Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS)


Lie #2. Continue to get smaller? I've posted the stats multiple times. The number was 340,000 in 2011. If it was continuing to get smaller we would be below 200,000 by now yet the number was 400,000 last year. And the numbers for the first two months of fy2019 are over 50,000 per month which extrapolates to 600,000 for a year. That is not "getting smaller".

The wall won't stop overstays. So friggin what? We have multiple problems that require multiple solutions. The time is past for playing one against the other to achieve inaction on all of them.
I also don't get why these anti-wall people keep deflecting with the visa over stayers. Who said that a wall would stop them? This is about stopping the border jumpers who are still coming by the thousands each month. Just when you thought you'd heard every lame excuse for not building the wall we keep hearing this lame excuse by them over and over again. Brain damage, perhaps? They act like we are ignoring the visa over stayers but we aren't. They certainly want to ignore the border jumpers though, don't they?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:38 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by staywarm2 View Post
The Dems don’t want to spend $ 5.8 billion for a wall when more up-to-date means are available. Trump only is fighting for the Wall because he wants to fulfill one of his silly campaign promises.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:40 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
It's clear that you aren't "grasping the situation here". It takes two to tango.

It's clear that democrats put illegal aliens ahead of American citizens. Why else are they against securing the border?
Fake news again?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:46 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRR View Post
Kind of interesting that the Trump ship appears to have hit an iceberg (in the form of the shutdown) and is going down by the bow. But he and his loyal to the end 35% supporters are still happy to keep saying that everything is going their way and they are winning. I guess if it goes down completely, they might have to admit that maybe a different course of action would have been a better idea.

Maybe when the water is up to their waists, Congress just might decide to take action with a veto proof majority. Or they can just choose to go down with flags flying. Fun time to be a Republican in Congress.
Trump Is Reportedly Unhappy Over TV Coverage of the Shutdown: 'We Are Getting Crushed!'
A Wednesday report in The New York Times paints a contradictory of President Donald Trump‘s position in an ongoing shutdown of the federal government: publicly unbowed but, at times, privately dismayed.

“We are getting crushed!” he said while recently watching coverage of the shutdown, according to the paper.

“Why can’t we get a deal?” he reportedly wondered.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/...134847980.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 03:47 PM
 
23,177 posts, read 12,231,255 times
Reputation: 29354
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
But the wall will do nothing to affect the people already in the US, so why are you looking at "overall illegal population" in the US? You should be looking at the number of new/additional illegal immigrants if you want to know the effect of a border wall on illegal immigration. According to your source, in 2014 2/3 of illegal immigrants were illegal overstays. So the border wall would affect at most some portion of the remaining 1/3 of illegal immigrants. Once you factor in Canadian border crossers and those who cross via legal ports of entry, you are probably looking at less than 1/4 of overall illegal immigrants affected by the wall. Moreover, according to your source, the ratio of overstays to illegal border crossers continues to trend towards overstays.

In other words, your 42% number is totally irrelevant to the discussion.

The number of border crossers has been trending downwards for years. 2017 had the fewest in at least 2 decades. Here's a chart. Explain to me how the number of border crossers is not generally continuing to get smaller.

Link

Dude, YOU are the one that brought up the overall illegal population with "they make up the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants". Maybe you worded it vaguely and meant to say "new / additional illegal immigrants" as you did above. I'm not concerned about the illegal population already here with respect to the wall.

2017 was low, as Trump came into power and illegals feared there would actually be consequences. Then they realized that the courts have him handcuffed and resumed coming in 2018. There is no "trending downwards" to the data over the last 8 years. Your little chart doesn't include 2018 which would show it jumping back up.

Sure, using 2000 as the baseline, the numbers are down. There was a big drop 2000-2002 (maybe something to do with 9/11?) and then a more gradual but steady drop from 2005-2011 (Secure Fence Act?) whereupon it then rose each of the next 4 years..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 04:02 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by BOS2IAD View Post
It takes two to tango. The dems are refusing to negotiate. Dems care about illegal aliens instead of American citizens.

If they cared about their furloughed constituents, then they should be coming to the table to work on a compromise. They wanted Trump to end the shutdown and then talk about border security later. Trump was smart not to trust the dems as they have proven themselves to be unworthy of trust. Reagan (whom I was no fan of) believed the promises dems made in order to get the 1986 amnesty. Once the amnesty happened, dems reneged on every promise they made. They promised that the border would be secured (it never has been secured); 2) They said that the 1986 amnesty would be the one and only amnesty to ever happen (there have been several stealth amnesties since then); and 3) They promised that no illegal would ever be able to find a job (currently we have 8 million no-match SSNs in the workforce).

It's not just Trump who isn't "budging". The dems aren't "budging" either.
Trump and McConnell aren't negotiating.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 04:08 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Republican Senators just voted to ease sanctions on the companies of the Kremlin-connected Oleg Deripaska.

They've been bought and paid for. Chances of them stepping up to the plate are slim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 04:17 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oldglory View Post
Funny how Schumer and Obama's signature was on the wall bill back in 2006 for the 700 miles on the most porous areas of our border but now it's a waste of money? Huh?
Obama had almost 700 miles of fencing built. How do you always forget that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 04:20 PM
 
Location: FL
20,702 posts, read 12,542,103 times
Reputation: 5452
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEPLimey View Post
Where is the budget justification for the $5.7 billion? Where is the proposed wall going to be put? What is the wall going to be made out of ? Where is the cost-benefit analysis? Where is the feasibility study? There are no specifics for the proposed wall. None. Just a $5.7 billion budget ask.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-17-2019, 04:22 PM
 
22,474 posts, read 12,011,140 times
Reputation: 20398
Quote:
Originally Posted by Donna-501 View Post
Fake news again?
Nope. It's the truth. Yet you don't (or don't want to) see it.

At one time dems truly looked out for the poor, working and middle classes. Those dems of yore would have been horrified to discover that their constituents were either seeing their wages depressed or were being displaced in the workforce due to illegal immigration. And they would have done something about it---and I don't mean amnesty for illegals either.

Today's dems put illegal aliens ahead of the millions of suffering underemployed and unemployed American citizens. They must be laughing themselves sick over how they have duped their minions into believing that they still care about them.

Neither party is looking our for Americans. However, at one time I would have expected much, much better from the dems.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top