Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The special counsel's office said the "description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office... is inaccurate."
There might be things reported that are true, but we don't know what, if any, those things are or might be. That's the way it stands for now.
The special counsel's office said the "description of specific statements to the Special Counsel's Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office... is inaccurate."
There might be things reported that are true, but we don't know what, if any, those things are or might be. That's the way it stands for now.
“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate,” Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller’s office, said.
that means everything that buzzweed used as source from the Special Counsel and documents it's false....you take that out of the story and you don't have a story........If the Special Counsel doesn't back up the documents and the allegations that it came out of the Mueller team then the story is fake, cr@p and nothing is believable......no court would take this as evidence and these 2 clowns that they call reporters would never make it to the witness stand. They didn't even see the evidence.
“BuzzFeed’s description of specific statements to the Special Counsel’s Office, and characterization of documents and testimony obtained by this office, regarding Michael Cohen’s Congressional testimony are not accurate,” Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller’s office, said.
that means everything that buzzweed used as source from the Special Counsel and documents it's false....you take that out of the story and you don't have a story........If the Special Counsel doesn't back up the documents and the allegations that it came out of the Mueller team then the story is fake, cr@p and nothing is believable......no court would take this as evidence and these 2 clowns that they call reporters would never make it to the witness stand. They didn't even see the evidence.
It does not in anyway disavow buzzfeeds story in its entirety. If it was complete bunk Mueller would have state the story was completely inaccurate. he did not.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
