Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Republicans today are changing the course of history but, NOT by using any compassion. My dad's republican party is gone.
Who would have thought it would be democrats trying to uphold the constitution and the republicans trying to protect a president who cares nothing of the constitution. The times they are a changing.
democrats today are changing the course of history but, NOT by using any compassion. My dad's democrat party is gone.
Who would have thought it would be republicans trying to uphold the constitution and the democrats trying to destroy a president who cares about the constitution.
No modern president has ever vilified black Americans and sought to divide people along racial lines like Mr. Trump, while also outlandishly claiming to be a champion of their interests. And now we have Trumpers boasting they and he are to be compared to Abe Lincoln while rewriting history and current events
Make no mistake, this is absurd and obvious. And disgusting.
No modern president has ever vilified black Americans and sought to divide people along racial lines like OBAMA!
lol Your link proves my point
dems 46/67 =68.7%
repubs 27/33= 81.8%
Your youtube link doesn't work. I fixed it for you. Mattehws tries to interupt and after he stopped Ron Paul read him the rules based on property rights. At least Matthews backed off.
Being against Jim Crow is the same reason to be against government involvement in the private sector as far as discrimination. Government cannot violate the rights of the property owners by forcing them to work for, or hire someone a certain way. Having property rights, the property owner has the right to discriminate and having property rights the property owner has the right to not discriminate. Jim Crow took that last part away. The property owner was forced to discriminate.
You cannot discriminate in the public sector as that violates equal protection. Everyone pays into the system.
We can all agree that we don't like discrimination but there is a way to fight it and you don't do it by violating rights. The idea was to use Civil Disobedience like what we saw in the Civil Rights marches. The tide had already turned because people took a stand. Government came along after the fact.
"You cannot discriminate in the public sector as that violates equal protection." which is why Affirmative Action is in direct VIOLATION of the Equal Rights Act!
No modern president has ever vilified black Americans and sought to divide people along racial lines like Mr. Trump, while also outlandishly claiming to be a champion of their interests. And now we have Trumpers boasting they and he are to be compared to Abe Lincoln while rewriting history and current events
Make no mistake, this is absurd and obvious. And disgusting.
That's all bull **** lies and conjecture!
Why do leftist live in such FANTASY???
No ones saying they are all inclusive but you. In this entire thread you and only you are saying it. That's because the ones who care about the truth, the ones who are being honest in this thread, are factually pointing out that the democrats owned Jim Crow, that the Democrat party is the party that voted for and backed bigotry. The evidence and the facts tell us this.
Well yes back then but the parties flipped 180 degrees, why are the past important today. Take a good look at the republicans particularly in the Deep South.
Why is 1863 important, seems like a desperate attempt to dismiss their current track record.
Last edited by Goodnight; 01-02-2020 at 06:51 AM..
According to several right wingers on this forum, slavery was not a major issue of the civil war and Honest Abe was a horrible racist. Remember the outrage about removing confederate statues and flags.
The cognitive dissonance of conservative republicans on this issue is positively astounding.
In the very same breath they will talk about the republicans freeing the slaves and that the Civil War was about "states rights" and not slavery.
One second they are talking about how evil the slave holding democrats were and how they would still hold slaves today if they could... and the next second they are doggedly defending statues of these same slave holding democrats spouting "heritage not hate".
Well yes back then but the parties flipped 180 degrees, why are the past important today. Take a good look at the republicans particularly in the Deep South.
I noticed when you mention Johnsons' n*****s comment they get quiet and change the subject!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
