Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:01 AM
 
1,336 posts, read 1,533,188 times
Reputation: 202

Advertisements

The trainwreck that is the Obama admiinistration has shown we need to reform voting standards NOW. Suggestions:

1) Only those paying income tax may vote.
2) Raise the minimum voting age to 25.

The framers were onto something when they said only landowners could vote. They founders knew voting was a privilege and only active contributors to the system should have a say.

We should revert to that mentality today. Only those who show gross income on their tax returns should be allowed to vote. If you don't contribute, you don't deserve the privilege. We use the gross figure so as not to penalize people who play the game but have earned tax credits or other deductions which help the economy (such as charitable contributions and depreciation for rental property).

If you're a welfare momma, you stay home on election day. This isn't a punishment; it's the absence of a privilege. Only those who support the system should get a say in how money is spent. If you only sponge off society, why should you get to vote yourself more benefits?

This would go along way in slowing the cycle of inter-generational dependency the Democrats have created. It would also curtail their practice of getting elected by buying votes as Obama has done. And above all, it will reverse the ever-looming point-of-no-return threshold where more than half the population pays no taxes. (See the Roman Empire).

As for a minimum voting age, I think it's important to have first-hand historical perspective. 1992 seems like yesterday to me. For those who recall, we had a similar situation as we have today. We had an unqualified candidate in Bill Clinton with a thin resume and questionable character getting a total pass. We saw the results; an ineffective incompetent morally bankrupt president whose big legacy was getting impeached. We paid for his inaction against terrorism with 9-11. You could argue Clinton's incompetence and inattention to the job (he spent all of 1998 working on his impeachment defense) caused 9-11 and thus the Iraq War. Economically, Clinton's actions with the CRA were the foundation of the mortgage crisis and the subsequent severe recession we are in. Yes, we are still paying and paying dearly because the media failed to scrutinize Bill Clinton.

The problem is, many young voters don't remember any of this. An 18-year-old is too young to have witnessed the backstory, and to have seen the disaster from a media that does not vet liberal candidates.

The result? History has repeated itself. We again elected a completely unvetted unqualified incompetent dishonest candidate in Obama who, only a month in, is wreaking disaster on this country and this economy. And as with Bill Clinton, America will be paying a dear price for decades to come for not heeding history.

Do you really think a homeless bum living over a grate downtown, or a 20-year-old unmarried high school dropout on welfare with three kids should have an equal say in choosing our leadership as the guy working 70 hours a week, employing five workers, and raising a decent family?

I don't. We need voting reform NOW!

 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:12 AM
 
Location: Chicago Suburbs
3,199 posts, read 4,319,109 times
Reputation: 1176
Default I like it

Now if we could work an I.Q. test and an American history quiz into the elgibility requirement ...
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:13 AM
 
Location: Flyover Country
26,211 posts, read 19,535,610 times
Reputation: 21679
The best trolls are the most literate ones.
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:16 AM
 
4,104 posts, read 5,312,313 times
Reputation: 1256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eeeee22895 View Post
The trainwreck that is the Obama admiinistration has shown we need to reform voting standards NOW. Suggestions:

1) Only those paying income tax may vote.
2) Raise the minimum voting age to 25.
Seems fair to me. Anybody that is not paying taxes should not have a say over how those of us that do spend them.

I think every American taxpayer or family should have to pay at least $500.
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:17 AM
 
2,095 posts, read 2,582,915 times
Reputation: 1268
I think we need to raise the voting age back to 21 when you are legally considered an adult.
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:32 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,537 times
Reputation: 557
Eeeee, your village misses you and needs you to keep it alive. Go home.

"welfare moms" and/or "homeless bums" (your words) do not need you to speak for them or against them. You just want to play "king"......king troll.
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:40 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,537 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bostonian123 View Post
I think we need to raise the voting age back to 21 when you are legally considered an adult.
Is 21 the legal age for joining the military in this country? If not, should the legal age for joining the military and going to war to fight and possibly die be raised to 21?
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:43 AM
 
3,857 posts, read 4,217,537 times
Reputation: 557
Default EeeeeK

"The trainwreck that is the Obama admiinistration has shown we need to reform voting standards NOW. Suggestions:

1) Only those paying income tax may vote.
2) Raise the minimum voting age to 25."


Should we raise the legal age for joining the mililtary to 25 as well? Not smart enough to vote prior to age 25, but still "valid" enough to go to war and be killed if under age 25?

Let's see. If your wife doesn't work and doesn't have to pay income taxes because she earns no income, should she NOT BE ALLOWED to vote?
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:49 AM
 
7,138 posts, read 14,644,210 times
Reputation: 2397
Excellent thread. The ignorant, uneducated, illiterate non-taxpayers are growing by leaps and bounds, so needs to be reformed quickly.
 
Old 03-01-2009, 10:52 AM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,322,479 times
Reputation: 8958
I'm definitely for raising the voting age. The state of the public schools is so bad that most high school students haven't a clue what they are voting for. They have no idea of our histroy, and are taught that capitalism is bad.

Is it any wonder we wind up with people like Obama, and the Democrat idiots that we have in Congress like Pelosi, Reid, Barbara Boxer, Maxine Waters, Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer ... Well I guess I'd have to name almost every one.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top