Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The SC Governor has nothing whatsoever to do with children having safe schools and usable textbooks.
Those are issues of South Carolina school districts.
"First he made a big national showing of turning down funds from President Obama's $787-billion stimulus package, arguing that he would accept the state's $700 million only to pay down South Carolina's debt -- not for its intended purpose to fund education and law enforcement programs. Sued by an 18-year-old high school senior, he lost in court. He tussled with the state's attorney general over the issue and suffered setbacks in the Legislature, which overrode his vetoes on spending the money."
Not true at all, that would be the responsible thing to do, but they arent "required" to let people know where they are 24 hours a day.
No different than if the man had taken his wife to NYC for dinner one day, he doesnt have to let everyone know where he's at.. The only thing mysterious about this is that he didnt tell his wife his location but there is a chain of command for all "professional jobs" for that very reason.
If you cant reach #1 in charge, you go to #2, just because #2 doesnt know where #1 is, doesnt mean they cant make a decision without checking in first.
"Huffington Post reports this morning that the trail the governor is hiking along is actually one of the beneficiaries of the stimulus funding. The Appalachian Trail will receive $650 thousand for a spruce up."
"First he made a big national showing of turning down funds from President Obama's $787-billion stimulus package, arguing that he would accept the state's $700 million only to pay down South Carolina's debt -- not for its intended purpose to fund education and law enforcement programs. Sued by an 18-year-old high school senior, he lost in court. He tussled with the state's attorney general over the issue and suffered setbacks in the Legislature, which overrode his vetoes on spending the money."
Lol, you and the other poster surmise, and then make your conclusion based on your own surmise.
Not really,I read what the leftists here post.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
