Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Visvaldis -
if you were not careful the glasses could have been clouded by minute scratches from wiping them dry or a very dusty environment. Or, worse, like what happened to me, you own internal lenses could have become clouded with cataracts. Fortunately both can be cured.
PS the $1200 glasses may have had small diamonds in the frame holding the $50 lenses.
Don't jubilate yet! My prescription glasses (at Dr Bizers) cost me $183. In less than two years the lenses became cloudy. Looking through them everything appears as if in a thick fog. $183 for nothing.
and this is the fault of Healthcare Insurance companies because....???...????
Visvaldis -
if you were not careful the glasses could have been clouded by minute scratches from wiping them dry or a very dusty environment. Or, worse, like what happened to me, you own internal lenses could have become clouded with cataracts. Fortunately both can be cured.
PS the $1200 glasses may have had small diamonds in the frame holding the $50 lenses.
I see better without the foggy glasses. I lived in Germany for many years. In 1979, in Germany, I bought prescription glasses that cost the equivalent of $30. The lenses are still clear and I wear these when driving at night. My deduction, the $183 glasses from Dr Bizers are vastly overpriced and certainly inferior.
Visvaldis -
if you were not careful the glasses could have been clouded by minute scratches from wiping them dry or a very dusty environment. Or, worse, like what happened to me, you own internal lenses could have become clouded with cataracts. Fortunately both can be cured.
PS the $1200 glasses may have had small diamonds in the frame holding the $50 lenses.
…small diamonds put there nefariously by evil Insurance executives bent on making 3.4% profits on people and thus controlling the worlds resources so they can further blind people with foggy eyeglasses!
NOW we understand why we must all join with The Obama and save the world from 3.4% profitmakers!
Look at his comments about doctors removing kids tonsils for more profit and amputating diabetes patients feet to make more profit. Outrageous comments in the least form a lawyer.Talk about rethoric from the top.
The interesting question is: Where does the premium money actually go? Are funds primarily allocated to patients who need treatment, or to those who specialize in finding faults in paperwork to rescind coverage? How much goes to marketing? How much to lobby against healthcare legislation? How much to defend against lawsuits from those who thought they were covered?
In other words, it would be rather interesting to see a breakdown of the operating expenses and the intake vs. payout scale. With the CEO of United Healthcare making in the neighborhood of $750 million per year, I can't help having a feeling that perhaps the administrative overhead could be slimmed down quite a bit.
Run the damn things as non-profits, regulate the everloving out of them and tell their CEOs that they'll have to make do with just one Gulfstream.
I was just looking through the highest ranking CEO compensations for the past five years to see just who these CEO were. It was not until number 53 that Cigna's CEO was found. And Cigna is number 5 on the list of largest Healthcare insurance companies.
If you want to see who the real big players are look at the top 52. It should amaze you how well the Resident and Godvernment has helped them out.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.