Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
First of all, not a single one of the signs depicted in those pictures has been photoshopped: they are all extensively documented, with links to the original source pages; and they are self-evidently real as well. So your dismissive claim of "Your photoshopped protest signs are unconvincing" holds no water: your only defense against the damning images is to completely dismiss them out of hand, but you had no factual basis on which to dismiss them, which fatally undermines your argument.
As for the other statements that no one ever had a "Kill Bush" shirt: Did you even look at the linked page? It has several examples of "Kill Bush" shirts and paraphernalia, including this one and this one.
When someone presents you with evidence directly in front of your eyes, and your response is to say "I don't see any evidence," then you are conceding defeat in the argument, because you obviously have no valid response to the conclusive proof which defeats your position.
Why is it no one ever heard of or had seen these t-shirts yet the Psalm 109:8 is is now widely reported and known by most people?
It certainly seems the deranged rightwingers who like this stuff and promote this crap are more evident and, judging from the Teabagger rallies they are also quite numerous.
Guess a couple radical lefties dont compare to the lunatic fringe rightwing in numbers
Why is it no one ever heard of or had seen these t-shirts yet the Psalm 109:8 is is now widely reported and known by most people?
A HA!
Now you're beginning to see the light!
Why? Why is it no one ever heard of or had seen these t-shirts yet the Psalm 109:8 is is now widely reported and known by most people?
Think about it.
The reason?
BECAUSE THE MEDIA IS BIASED. With a left-wing slant. That's why.
The media chooses what to cover and what to ignore. It's a very clever way of slanting the news. If there's one potential news story that embarrasses the Left, and a different potential news story which embarrasses the Right, the media will CONSCIOUSLY ignore the story the embarrasses the Left and "bury" it under other news; while simultaneously playing up and highlight the story the embarrasses the Right.
This way, they can "honestly" claim that they're not telling any lies, because the story they did report was factual. But the story they swept under the rug was factual too, and yet they didn't let you see it
This is known as "lying through omission," and it's how the modern mainstream media works.
It's not that the t-shirts didn't exist: it's that the overwhelmingly liberal-leaning media didn't want you (or anyone) to know about them, because they correctly surmised that the shirts would make the Left look bad.
And the same holds true for all the other endless embarrassing facts that could and should have condemned the Left to the arena of laughingstocks. You (and people like you) don't see reality because the media withholds it from you.
Liberals and the left-wing in general spent eight years protraying Bush as Hitler, as a chimpanzee, as the Joker, and wishing for his death; and the media spent eight years doing its best to hide these inconvenient facts from the public.
Now, a vastly smaller numbr opf right-wingers are doing similarly stupid things, yet those few right-wingers are getting top-of-the-news front page play on a daily basis.
Why? Why is it no one ever heard of or had seen these t-shirts yet the Psalm 109:8 is is now widely reported and known by most people?
Think about it.
The reason?
BECAUSE THE MEDIA IS BIASED. With a left-wing slant. That's why.
The media chooses what to cover and what to ignore. It's a very clever way of slanting the news. If there's one potential news story that embarrasses the Left, and a different potential news story which embarrasses the Right, the media will CONSCIOUSLY ignore the story the embarrasses the Left and "bury" it under other news; while simultaneously playing up and highlight the story the embarrasses the Right.
This way, they can "honestly" claim that they're not telling any lies, because the story they did report was factual. But the story they swept under the rug was factual too, and yet they didn't let you see it
This is known as "lying through omission," and it's how the modern mainstream media works.
It's not that the t-shirts didn't exist: it's that the overwhelmingly liberal-leaning media didn't want you (or anyone) to know about them, because they correctly surmised that the shirts would make the Left look bad.
And the same holds true for all the other endless embarrassing facts that could and should have condemned the Left to the arena of laughingstocks. You (and people like you) don't see reality because the media withholds it from you.
Liberals and the left-wing in general spent eight years protraying Bush as Hitler, as a chimpanzee, as the Joker, and wishing for his death; and the media spent eight years doing its best to hide these inconvenient facts from the public.
Now, a vastly smaller numbr opf right-wingers are doing similarly stupid things, yet those few right-wingers are getting top-of-the-news front page play on a daily basis.
And that is the answer to your question.
Try to spin it however you want. The reality is that the secret service reports a 400% increase in death threats since Obama took office.
Your attempt to use the "liberal media" meme is pathetic.
BECAUSE THE MEDIA IS BIASED. With a left-wing slant. That's why.
Bwahahahaha!!! The corporate media, the same one that looked the other way while Bush lied the country to war, is biased, and its a Lib'rule bias too!
Quote:
Originally Posted by qewpie
Liberals and the left-wing in general spent eight years protraying Bush as Hitler, as a chimpanzee, as the Joker, and wishing for his death; and the media spent eight years doing its best to hide these inconvenient facts from the public.
Ummm......I think you are mistaking this idea with a Glenn Beck Teabagger rally.
The problem is...using this "quote" is way too premature. We have Obama as our leader for over 3 more years-how can he already be condemned? Praying for his departure when he is just getting started is suspect, I could see it happening in 2011 but not now-seems malicious and more of a sinister thought to me than just getting him out of office.
Anyway, anyone wishing harm or ill will on any of our country's leaders, past or present, is just sad and pathetic.
Sanrene,I would like to know where your pics came from -the event,year, location....something. I bet half were from overseas.
The "Why didn't Cheney take Bush hunting instead?" t-shirt was popular for a couple of months. It had a picture of Bush with a target on him and Cheney with his shotgun. Since you guys didn't see it, it didn't exist though.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
