Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-28-2010, 05:57 PM
 
Location: Georgia
135 posts, read 139,106 times
Reputation: 57

Advertisements

"Obama took issue with a ruling that overturned two of the court's precedents and upended decades of restrictions on corporations being able to use their profits to finance campaigns for and against candidates." (taken from The Washington Post)
Kudos to Alito for his shaking his head and saying "Not true" as Obama stood there chastising the Supreme Court last night. We need more Alitos who will be clear on their stand in disagreement rather than the bobble heads who agree with Obama REGARDLESS of what comes out of his mouth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-28-2010, 05:59 PM
 
971 posts, read 1,295,030 times
Reputation: 384
Classically unprofessional and utterly unbecoming of a supposedly impartial instrument of the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:06 PM
 
Location: Riverside, CA
2,404 posts, read 4,403,724 times
Reputation: 2282
Quote:
Originally Posted by denverkid View Post
Classically unprofessional and utterly unbecoming of a supposedly impartial instrument of the law.
The members of the Supreme Court are there to represent the third branch of government. They are not supposed to be pro or con. Like you said impartial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:12 PM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
14,317 posts, read 22,391,475 times
Reputation: 18436
The conservative members of the Supreme Court need to be thrown off on their heads and have their arses kicked. They really bring down the quality of the Court and the decisions. The conservative ideology stinks.

President Obama is absolutely right in his assessment.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:15 PM
 
241 posts, read 267,519 times
Reputation: 130
Um, but it IS true. Foreign companies with a subsidiary in the US can contribute money for ad campaigns under this law. If it's not true, they need to be sure that's in the text of the law.

The whole law stinks and I am completely against it. I won't vote for any more corporate-owned candidates, Dem or Rep.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:16 PM
 
Location: Land of debt and Corruption
7,545 posts, read 8,329,379 times
Reputation: 2889
Quote:
Originally Posted by denverkid View Post
Classically unprofessional and utterly unbecoming of a supposedly impartial instrument of the law.
Yes, Obama was.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:16 PM
 
29,981 posts, read 42,944,845 times
Reputation: 12828
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archan View Post
The members of the Supreme Court are there to represent the third branch of government. They are not supposed to be pro or con. Like you said impartial.
Isn't clarifying fact impartial? If not, why not? Is it because it made it clear that this great Constitutional law professor occupying the office of POTUS did not understand the ruling to which he chose to refer in his address?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:18 PM
 
Location: NE Ohio
30,419 posts, read 20,315,673 times
Reputation: 8958
Quote:
Originally Posted by jksevers View Post
"Obama took issue with a ruling that overturned two of the court's precedents and upended decades of restrictions on corporations being able to use their profits to finance campaigns for and against candidates." (taken from The Washington Post)
Kudos to Alito for his shaking his head and saying "Not true" as Obama stood there chastising the Supreme Court last night. We need more Alitos who will be clear on their stand in disagreement rather than the bobble heads who agree with Obama REGARDLESS of what comes out of his mouth.
Well, clearly, Obama was wrong. And for him to criticize the Supreme Court that way, is pure arrogance.

Obama didn't have a clue. Or he lied on purpose.

The Supreme Court upheld free speech. This was a victory for all Ameicans, when we have a President, and his administration, who are tryig to limit free speech. Obama would like to silence talk radio, for example. I think the Supreme Court just made it clear that he cannot. That is why Obama is "pissed".

Too bad "Barry". Go back to Kenya. Have a nice life. You aren't welcome here. Poorest excuse for a "president" I have seen in my lifetime.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:21 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,982 posts, read 22,163,168 times
Reputation: 13809
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archan View Post
The members of the Supreme Court are there to represent the third branch of government. They are not supposed to be pro or con. Like you said impartial.
Which is why it was so disgusting for 0bama to invite them to his SOTU speech, and then lie and insult them on national TV, while encouraging the legislative branch to join him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-28-2010, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin's great north woods
1,240 posts, read 2,239,957 times
Reputation: 1195
Quote:
Originally Posted by denverkid View Post
Classically unprofessional and utterly unbecoming of a supposedly impartial instrument of the law.

Bingo.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:21 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top