How Come White House Gay Protest Off Limits To News Media? (homosexual)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just knowing your proclivity for lying to further your cause. You have continually displayed your bias toward avoiding the truth and displayed your willingness to avoid any facts that cause you discomfort or show the lengths you go to so as to attempt to support your lies. As stated before, it is obvious that anything you support is bad for the country and bad for the people.
So, you're saying that your statements were not actually based on anything at all, then. Just some bits of free-form prattle. As I thought. Next...
Good luck, Saganista!!!...but what you have here is a BRICK Wall.
I dunno. The density of fired clay brick is a mere 2,403 kilograms per cubic meter. I sometimes wonder if rolled lead at 11,389 mightn't be coming into play here...
So, you're saying that your statements were not actually based on anything at all, then. Just some bits of free-form prattle. As I thought. Next...
No, saying that that is your course of action, constantly. Your BS continues to amaze any who can think for themselves and not have the left wing do their thinking for them.
You cite no facts, just make them up as you go along. This would be fine if you stated them as your opinion, but you claim anything you say as fact. This makes you look foolish and proves you to be the liar you are.
Keep it up, though. Your lying for obama lets the rest of us know that we should do just the opposite of what you want and we will be fine.
Did no one here bother to go back to the link after it was first posted? Not sure how long after the initial posting this update was posted, but obviously not too many read it!
"That was strictly the U.S. Parks Police that screwed up – that has nothing to do with the Secret Service of the White House or the Administration," said Sergeant Schlosser. "We had some young officers who, when they were told to move the people back -- which we typically do when we're going to make arrests - they moved the people back a lot further than we typically do. That was a rookie, amateur error and they screwed up on that."
Did no one here bother to go back to the link after it was first posted? Not sure how long after the initial posting this update was posted, but obviously not too many read it!
Doing things like that would be indicative of a desire to understand the actual facts of a matter so as not to leap to any unwarranted conclusions over it.
The very objective of many right-wingers is specifically to leap to pre-established conclusions regardless of what any of the actual facts might have to say about the matter.
Doing things like that would be indicative of a desire to understand the actual facts of a matter so as not to leap to any unwarranted conclusions over it.
The very objective of many right-wingers is specifically to leap to pre-established conclusions regardless of what any of the actual facts might have to say about the matter.
Why do you have such a hard time accomodating skepticism and cynicism? One would think that DC Police, Park Police, and even Barney Fife would have protocol down to a science is this 2010 year. This isn't Mayberry. This is Washington DC. So why do you come to their defense? Why not just acknowledge that they all F*cked it up and citizens and media alike have every reason to be skeptical of this sudden bout of "we didn't know the policy" and "we weren't aware."
Why do you have such a hard time accomodating skepticism and cynicism? One would think that DC Police, Park Police, and even Barney Fife would have protocol down to a science is this 2010 year. This isn't Mayberry. This is Washington DC. So why do you come to their defense? Why not just acknowledge that they all F*cked it up and citizens and media alike have every reason to be skeptical of this sudden bout of "we didn't know the policy" and "we weren't aware."
And of course all new officers immediately know and understand all rules and regulations and never make a mistake simply out of their newness, do they? From my previous quote:
Quote:
"We had some young officers who, when they were told to move the people back -- which we typically do when we're going to make arrests - they moved the people back a lot further than we typically do. That was a rookie, amateur error and they screwed up on that."
And of course all new officers immediately know and understand all rules and regulations and never make a mistake simply out of their newness, do they? From my previous quote:
I often wonder why so many people hang on the words of others, especially the words of anyone with a bit of power in DC. OF COURSE they're going to blame the rookies! There is no other palpable explanation so they pull out the "newbie mistake" excuse and everything will be A-OK!
Why, why, why haven't people yet learned that DC itself is one big walking, talking criminal schema who creeps along, operating at will, without fear of retribution?!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
