Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-28-2018, 09:35 AM
 
4,264 posts, read 4,718,236 times
Reputation: 4084

Advertisements

NCDOT asked for I-36 but didn't get it. There is no NC 36 today, although there used to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-28-2018, 02:45 PM
 
Location: The City of Medicine
1,423 posts, read 1,479,117 times
Reputation: 1334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigeru View Post
I'd be glad if I 74 connected with I 74
Me too. It drops down to 45 in the gap section.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-29-2018, 02:06 PM
 
263 posts, read 572,783 times
Reputation: 300
Though I'm sure most of you know it already, I find it ridiculous that there will be two "40/42" intersections, about 2 miles from each other. I-40/NC-42, and I-40/I-42. CON-fusing!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 09:35 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
The US-70 Corridor Commission just posted the minutes of their July 19 meeting.

http://www.super70corridor.com/wp-co...ng-Minutes.pdf

...and NCDOT has given an update on projects along the corridor as of November 15.

Division 2: http://www.super70corridor.com/wp-co...Division-2.pdf

Division 4: http://www.super70corridor.com/wp-co...sion-4-002.pdf

NCDOT has also completed and posted it’s feasibility study for upgrading US-70 between Edwards Road in Princeton and Buffalo Road near Selma.

https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/p...eport_2018.pdf

Last edited by LM117; 11-30-2018 at 09:45 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 01:03 PM
 
Location: Research Triangle, NC
1,279 posts, read 1,723,733 times
Reputation: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigeru View Post
I'd be glad if I 74 connected with I 74

I'd also be glad if it connected with I-74. And also I-74. Maybe one day it will also connect to I-74.



On a less snarky note, if the connection to the I-74 in Ohio becomes very definitely dead on account of OH and WV canceling everything, would it be possible to renumber what we already have in NC?



Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
One thing I never understood is why NCDOT didn’t apply for a number like I-46, which would’ve likely gotten approved since it fits the numbering grid unlike NCDOT’s attempt at an out-of-grid number like I-36, which was bound to raise a few eyebrows at AASHTO, which led to it changing to I-42.

Personally I don’t have a problem with I-42, but the whole I-42/NC-42 issue seems like something that could’ve easily been avoided.

I've long given up on waiting for NCDOT to make sensible numbering choices for the new interstates. Greensboro did it for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 01:54 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,831,196 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by papilgee4evaeva View Post
On a less snarky note, if the connection to the I-74 in Ohio becomes very definitely dead on account of OH and WV canceling everything, would it be possible to renumber what we already have in NC?
Not unless Congress changes it, since they’re the ones that numbered the corridor. I don’t see that happening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 01:56 PM
 
1,322 posts, read 1,259,370 times
Reputation: 1859
I wish I-540 wasn't named 540. It can get confusing with NC 54 nearby and the toll road of NC 540.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Research Triangle, NC
1,279 posts, read 1,723,733 times
Reputation: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
Not unless Congress changes it, since they’re the ones that numbered the corridor. I don’t see that happening.
Good ol' Congress...
Quote:
Originally Posted by 919 rtp View Post
I wish I-540 wasn't named 540. It can get confusing with NC 54 nearby and the toll road of NC 540.
The toll road carries the same number because it's an extension of the Interstate (and was supposed to be an Interstate number, save for a silly funding issue). Since the route is destined to be a loop, 640 is the only other number available for use... but would you confuse that with nearby US 64?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-30-2018, 07:01 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,341,016 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by papilgee4evaeva View Post
The toll road carries the same number because it's an extension of the Interstate (and was supposed to be an Interstate number, save for a silly funding issue). Since the route is destined to be a loop, 640 is the only other number available for use... but would you confuse that with nearby US 64?
Well it's a moot point now with the Toll NC-540 completing the beltway/loop in the future, but besides I-640, they could have also given it I-840, since the first segment of I-540 opened years before the first segment of I-840 did in Greensboro and gave Greensboro I-640 instead.

I realize I-540 was a spur off of I-40 at the time it opened, so the odd number was the correct nomenclature, but for us "road geeks" seeing a loop/beltway/bypass with a even 3-digit number is a thing of beauty!

One of the biggest violators is the I-520 loop in Augusta and North Augusta, and that shield is permanent. When South Carolina completed the loop by adding onto the I-520 spur, it should have been renumbered I-220, I-420, I-620 or I-820, oh well, life goes on!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-01-2018, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Research Triangle, NC
1,279 posts, read 1,723,733 times
Reputation: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by cjseliga View Post
Well it's a moot point now with the Toll NC-540 completing the beltway/loop in the future, but besides I-640, they could have also given it I-840, since the first segment of I-540 opened years before the first segment of I-840 did in Greensboro and gave Greensboro I-640 instead.

I realize I-540 was a spur off of I-40 at the time it opened, so the odd number was the correct nomenclature, but for us "road geeks" seeing a loop/beltway/bypass with a even 3-digit number is a thing of beauty!

One of the biggest violators is the I-520 loop in Augusta and North Augusta, and that shield is permanent. When South Carolina completed the loop by adding onto the I-520 spur, it should have been renumbered I-220, I-420, I-620 or I-820, oh well, life goes on!
I'm always glad to find others that appreciate the little things in life just as I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top