Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
One thing i will say is, i never understood why feminists supported Bill Clinton so much, since he was such a womanizer. But now i get it. Womanizers really aren't a threat to your movement. Guys who get laid a lot aren't likely to go out and organize any protest marches. It's the angry, lonely, sexually frustrated men who are getting together to form these men's rights movements. If anyone poses a threat to feminism, it's the guys who are NOT getting laid. The guys who ARE getting laid are perfectly happy to kiss women's a$$es... they will support any political platform you ladies want. Now i am seeing why Bill Clinton cheating on his wife wasn't really a big deal in the eyes of many feminists. It's those old white Republican guys not getting any who pose a threat to feminism.
One thing i will say is, i never understood why feminists supported Bill Clinton so much, since he was such a womanizer. But now i get it. Womanizers really aren't a threat to your movement. Guys who get laid a lot aren't likely to go out and organize any protest marches. It's the angry, lonely, sexually frustrated men who are getting together to form these men's rights movements. If anyone poses a threat to feminism, it's the guys who are NOT getting laid. The guys who ARE getting laid are perfectly happy to kiss women's a$$es... they will support any political platform you ladies want. Now i am seeing why Bill Clinton cheating on his wife wasn't really a big deal in the eyes of many feminists. It's those old white Republican guys not getting any who pose a threat to feminism.
Seems you're saying that lonely sexually frustrated guys are more inclined to protest feminism and gals having rights and freedoms because regarding gals as human beings hinders them being able to force or 'peacefully protest' gals they want into having sex with them.
Seems you were possibly arrogantly and meanly flaunting your wealth, height, and body type taunting others.
There may have been quite a few gals who didn't ask you for money because they knew you could reject them those poor gals and their suffering.
I doubt i was arrogantly and meanly flaunting my wealth. First of all, i don't have that much wealth. Second, even if i didn't, i don't believe in flaunting it, as i mentioned earlier.
Flaunting my height and body type?? Not really sure what you mean by that or if it even makes sense.
I doubt i was arrogantly and meanly flaunting my wealth. First of all, i don't have that much wealth. Second, even if i didn't, i don't believe in flaunting it, as i mentioned earlier.
Flaunting my height and body type?? Not really sure what you mean by that or if it even makes sense.
Likely you have more wealth than some and while you may not think you were flaunting you may have been to some. No different than the gals looking attractive may not think they were flaunting their bodies but to you they are.
Flaunting your height and body type means being insensitive and lacking compassionate for the poor guys with height and body type issues with you exerting your power over them.
It makes as much sense as your gals are arrogantly and meanly flaunting their bodies to taunt you because they look attractive and can say no to sex.
one thing i will say is, i never understood why feminists supported bill clinton so much, since he was such a womanizer. But now i get it. Womanizers really aren't a threat to your movement. Guys who get laid a lot aren't likely to go out and organize any protest marches. it's the angry, lonely, sexually frustrated men who are getting together to form these men's rights movements. if anyone poses a threat to feminism, it's the guys who are not getting laid. The guys who are getting laid are perfectly happy to kiss women's a$$es... They will support any political platform you ladies want. Now i am seeing why bill clinton cheating on his wife wasn't really a big deal in the eyes of many feminists. It's those old white republican guys not getting any who pose a threat to feminism.
***so everyone is wondering if they were one of the people that helped or not***
I think by "helping" it is posting what the OP wants to hear instead of what they need to hear. IMO.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
