Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-06-2014, 07:29 PM
 
Location: FL
1,400 posts, read 1,578,711 times
Reputation: 2016

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by burgler09 View Post
Tinder is a lot more mainstream, also people on tinder aren't always using it for dating. Many people sign up for tinder simply to look at pictures of other people and say yes or no. There really isn't a stigma of online dating attached to it. I think that's what makes tinder have a higher ratio of good looking people.
If that's the case it doesn't sound much different than 'hot or not'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-06-2014, 11:01 PM
 
663 posts, read 778,671 times
Reputation: 498
Quote:
Originally Posted by burgler09 View Post
Tinder is a lot more mainstream, also people on tinder aren't always using it for dating. Many people sign up for tinder simply to look at pictures of other people and say yes or no. There really isn't a stigma of online dating attached to it. I think that's what makes tinder have a higher ratio of good looking people.
I think tinder has a ratio of above average good looking people.

Possibly for the reason that if you know you aren't good looking, there is no point using tinder because most people know tinder is a "looks" based site.


I guess it is just like basketball tryout would have way above average basketball players than the general population.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 01:13 AM
 
33,016 posts, read 27,477,048 times
Reputation: 9074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emigrations View Post
I'm in Indianapolis and OKC and POF have some good looking women and a lot of average or ugly women, but the women on Tinder are almost all in their 20s and uniformly 7/10 or better? Does Tinder just attract a different demographic?

As a technological laggard, I don't have a smartphone and have never even seen Tinder, but I can easily imagine a selection bias working here:

Since Tinder is pretty much all about looks, I would expect users to be drawn from among the above-average in attractiveness, and also expect those not above average to prefer options which play to their strengths, of which looks are not at or near the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 03:19 AM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,620,773 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by bannedontherun View Post
If that's the case it doesn't sound much different than 'hot or not'.
There's no rating system, so it's more like the "Meet Me" feature on Hot or Not. The difference with Tinder is that it's totally free and people actually use it. I haven't been on Hot or Not for years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 03:27 AM
 
Location: Phoenix, Az
432 posts, read 492,009 times
Reputation: 531
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hivemind31 View Post
I thought that at first (and there are some), but it connects to your facebook network and shows mutual friends. In addition, many of the pics here show local college and sports paraphernalia, so I'm pretty certain they're legit.
That's what they SAY. I used it for a while and it was nothing but bot-after-bot-after-bot... I gave up after a few months. No one was real.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 06:32 AM
 
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,995,252 times
Reputation: 40635
Quote:
Originally Posted by variant View Post
That's what they SAY. I used it for a while and it was nothing but bot-after-bot-after-bot... I gave up after a few months. No one was real.

How could you tell if it was just a picture?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 06:54 AM
 
Location: Terra
2,826 posts, read 3,994,891 times
Reputation: 3374
Quote:
Originally Posted by timberline742 View Post
How could you tell if it was just a picture?
If you match a bot, they'll send you canned messages after matching.

I don't seem to have many bots around me though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 07:03 AM
 
5,121 posts, read 6,807,257 times
Reputation: 5833
Quote:
Originally Posted by techcrium View Post
I think tinder has a ratio of above average good looking people.

Possibly for the reason that if you know you aren't good looking, there is no point using tinder because most people know tinder is a "looks" based site.


I guess it is just like basketball tryout would have way above average basketball players than the general population.
Quote:
Originally Posted by freemkt View Post
As a technological laggard, I don't have a smartphone and have never even seen Tinder, but I can easily imagine a selection bias working here:

Since Tinder is pretty much all about looks, I would expect users to be drawn from among the above-average in attractiveness, and also expect those not above average to prefer options which play to their strengths, of which looks are not at or near the top.
I don't have a smartphone either (they look fun, but I don't see the need for it yet).

Anyway, based on what I read about it, I think these two explanations pretty much nailed it. If it's solely a looks based app, then it will be used mainly by people who will get the most out of it (good looking people because it plays to their strengths). Others will use other options that play to their strengths like Freemkt said.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 08:44 AM
 
14,078 posts, read 16,620,773 times
Reputation: 17654
Quote:
Originally Posted by jillabean View Post
I don't have a smartphone either (they look fun, but I don't see the need for it yet).

Anyway, based on what I read about it, I think these two explanations pretty much nailed it. If it's solely a looks based app, then it will be used mainly by people who will get the most out of it (good looking people because it plays to their strengths). Others will use other options that play to their strengths like Freemkt said.
Not everyone on Tinder is attractive though. I doubt that most people are saying to themselves, "I'm not hot enough to use Tinder." If they want to try it out, they will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2014, 08:58 AM
 
36,563 posts, read 30,900,697 times
Reputation: 32858
Its like real life, but its better.

LOL.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top