Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:02 AM
 
2,981 posts, read 2,937,079 times
Reputation: 600

Advertisements

- Christians having tried to adapt religious obediance within
the instruction of Scholars.
To teach their The Old and New Testaments as
'the inerrant infalible Word Of God' ?

Believing, 'ALL scripture is
given by inspiration [breath] of God..' ? - 2 Tim.2:16

Actually fails the Genesis understanding
that God breathed into Adam.
Which neither made him infalible nor inerrant.
Proves God could breathe without commanding anything.

For if scripture wasn't falible to inerrancy?
Then why would God have to provide 'The New Better Covenant'?

So, 'ALL scripure is given by inspiration of God
and profitable for Doctine...'

But not ALL scripture is Doctrine.

Although chrisians have had to accept
such differences in the narratives of 'The Four Gospels'.

They teach every word from the Apostle Paul's mouth
was the Infalible Inerrant Words Of God.
More to control than to console.
Falsehood is always revealed by it's hypocrisy.

When in Paul's own letters it's proved
he'd not spoke from God on many accounts. Either not as a witness.
Or professing to speak in 'customs' and 'traditions'.
By his own 'desire' for men and women. - 1 Tm.2:8-11
As of what he himself would not 'permit' of women. v.12
Commanding Women to be Judged by brethern
as under The Law. - 1Cor.14:34

Even professing an exact order of those who
saw Jesus after He was raised from the dead the third day.
which not only didn't Paul mention Mary first of all.
Paul did mention Mary at all. - 1Cor.15
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:42 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,847,398 times
Reputation: 12341
Well, apparently, God did not want any part of "man" (Abraham/David's lineage) in Jesus but needed Mary to bring Jesus. Because, that was the only way Jesus could be born out of "sin"? As interesting as that sounds, let us not forget that this idea of God, and the idea that the Bible is infallible word of His, was delivered by sinners. The more I look into deistic, mythological aspects used and abused within Christianity, the more amusing they turn out to be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 10:51 AM
 
939 posts, read 1,026,011 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Well, apparently, God did not want any part of "man" (Abraham/David's lineage) in Jesus but needed Mary to bring Jesus. Because, that was the only way Jesus could be born out of "sin"? A
good synopsis.

Joseph and Mary were both of the line of David, as well--so he is qualified to be a King of the line of David.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,847,398 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoGeek View Post
good synopsis.

Joseph and Mary were both of the line of David, as well--so he is qualified to be a King of the line of David.
They were related? Anyway, I don't think Jewish customs dictated passing down of lineage thru a woman. But regardless, I thought the idea of virgin birth was to skip that whole "all men are sinners" debacle. What makes women immune to that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 11:14 AM
 
4,729 posts, read 4,372,929 times
Reputation: 1578
I'm confused. I thought G-d was Jesus' father? What does Joseph have to do with this discussion, since "virgin birth" Chrstians say Joseph was not the father? And Mary's lineage matters not to determine Jesus' tribe, as tribe is indicated only by the father. Last I checked, G-d was not from the tribe of Judah (of which King David also decended).

TheoGeek, you have a problem with your theory here. Are there any others here who can explain what TheoGeek is unable to explain himself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 11:18 AM
 
939 posts, read 1,026,011 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
They were related? Anyway, I don't think Jewish customs dictated passing down of lineage thru a woman. But regardless, I thought the idea of virgin birth was to skip that whole "all men are sinners" debacle. What makes women immune to that?
If you go back several generations, they were of the same line. But you are correct--traditionally, the Hebrew line was only through the father.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 11:19 AM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,847,398 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoGeek View Post
If you go back several generations, they were of the same line. But you are correct--traditionally, the Hebrew line was only through the father.
Still doesn't answer why women would be immune from "sin". Wasn't that advertised as the whole premise for a virgin birth? God either wanted Abraham/David lineage (who would fall into the sinners category) or He did not. Which was it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 11:54 AM
 
939 posts, read 1,026,011 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Still doesn't answer why women would be immune from "sin". Wasn't that advertised as the whole premise for a virgin birth? God either wanted Abraham/David lineage (who would fall into the sinners category) or He did not. Which was it?
Eve was created to be Adam's helper. Man was created as the "head" of the woman. The apostle Paul states that we sinned through Adam...but it was actually Eve that ate of the fruit first. Adam was there--he could have stopped her, but he didn't. As a consequence, we inherit a sinful nature via our earthly fathers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 12:01 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,847,398 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoGeek View Post
Eve was created to be Adam's helper. Man was created as the "head" of the woman. The apostle Paul states that we sinned through Adam...but it was actually Eve that ate of the fruit first. Adam was there--he could have stopped her, but he didn't. As a consequence, we inherit a sinful nature via our earthly fathers.
So, Eve was spared of sinful nature/inheritance? Really? Where can we see evidence of that in the Bible? If anything, I see a mention of God's wrath on Eve. But then, there's always a chance that Mary's lineage traces to another tribe, like one where Cain showed up to marry?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-28-2011, 12:07 PM
 
3,483 posts, read 4,049,967 times
Reputation: 756
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
So, Eve was spared of sinful nature/inheritance? Really? Where can we see evidence of that in the Bible? If anything, I see a mention of God's wrath on Eve. But then, there's always a chance that Mary's lineage traces to another tribe, like one where Cain showed up to marry?

I think you're correct about your critique - what made Marry "sinless"?
Later theologians would create the idea of the Immaculate Conception - which had nothing to do with Jesus, lest it be confused: only by extension! No - MARY was conceived miraculously, and not from sinful flesh. That is how later Theologians handled your question. They just pushed it back a generation lol.

I think their answer was silly, but hey...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:50 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top