Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
 [Register]
Seattle area Seattle and King County Suburbs
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-27-2012, 06:15 AM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57821

Advertisements

I have spent a lot of time in Ballard, and what is happening is that older homes on larger lots, most of which were rentals are being torn down and replaced by 2 smaller homes or small town homes with 2-4 units. That reduces the available rental homes and drives up the rents.
As the new apartments go up, that much less land is available, driving the price per sf up.
Whether the commute is nasty or not, it's still the most popular place in Seattle for families and one of the top 2-3 for young people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-27-2012, 09:40 AM
 
5,075 posts, read 11,077,437 times
Reputation: 4669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
I have spent a lot of time in Ballard, and what is happening is that older homes on larger lots, most of which were rentals are being torn down and replaced by 2 smaller homes or small town homes with 2-4 units. That reduces the available rental homes and drives up the rents.
As the new apartments go up, that much less land is available, driving the price per sf up.
Whether the commute is nasty or not, it's still the most popular place in Seattle for families and one of the top 2-3 for young people.
I see what you're saying, but don't think the impact is high enough to be important. These are two different trends mixed together - the replacement of cheap, poor condition older homes as inexpensive rentals (gentrification) and net migration to the neighborhood.

Replacing one rental house with 2-4 units does increase supply over the long run. Not all of these units are going to be owner occupied, and for the ones that are the owners likely vacated a rental nearby when moving in as new the multi-unit properties are targeted towards first time buyers.

All we can prove is the # of rental SFH's is going down. More specifically, the # of run-down, undersized low rent houses near arterials is decreasing. At the same time, the number of rental units is set to increase very rapidly, requiring a huge increase in migration to keep rents at the current level. This, at the same time that thousands of similar buildings are being built in competing neighborhoods.

I'm not disagreeing that Ballard is a desirable neighborhood (heck, I bought near there for a reason!). Just that mid-high end rentals may be temporarily overbuilt since it's not the only popular neighborhood expanding at this pace.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Washington > Seattle area
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top