Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-18-2016, 03:07 PM
 
Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
336 posts, read 398,299 times
Reputation: 153

Advertisements

Maybe the most stupid question ever, but I always asked this to myself.


I mean, in this modern age, you don't nessecarily have to live at places where agriculture is possible. Nevertheless, in places north of the 60th parallel, polulation growth is mostly negative (Iceland is an exception).


Cold and darkness will give some explanation but there should be more reasons.


Any ideas?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-18-2016, 03:27 PM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,797,212 times
Reputation: 11103
Partly because traditional reasons. Because the area was so sparsely populated before, there is not much infrastructure there, work or housing. I don't see any reason why anyone would move there now, unless they want to be in total wilderness.

Oulu in Finland is one of the few exceptions. It had 37k inhabitants in 1950 and today the area has 200k.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 03:37 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,540 posts, read 1,124,726 times
Reputation: 2542
We live above the 45th parallel.....We love winters and due to being on the west side of the time zone our days are longer than when we lived in Pennsylvania....People are woosies generally and don't want to shovel snow but its great exercise and it more than makes up for the low humidity blissful summers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 03:37 PM
 
Location: In transition
10,635 posts, read 16,696,046 times
Reputation: 5248
Iqaluit is actually growing fast. Between 2006 and 2011 the community grew 8.3%. I think that's mostly due to a high birth rate and not due to immigration.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 03:51 PM
 
6,908 posts, read 7,665,376 times
Reputation: 2595
Quote:
Originally Posted by deneb78 View Post
Iqaluit is actually growing fast. Between 2006 and 2011 the community grew 8.3%. I think that's mostly due to a high birth rate and not due to immigration.
No it's not. It's because the Inuit are moving to the town and leaving their small hamlets.

-----

To answer OP: because it's too damn cold, cannot farm or anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 04:03 PM
 
Location: Orcutt, CA (Santa Maria Valley)
3,314 posts, read 2,215,060 times
Reputation: 960
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weidehond View Post
Maybe the most stupid question ever, but I always asked this to myself.


I mean, in this modern age, you don't nessecarily have to live at places where agriculture is possible. Nevertheless, in places north of the 60th parallel, polulation growth is mostly negative (Iceland is an exception).


Cold and darkness will give some explanation but there should be more reasons.


Any ideas?
A different reason why Florida, Texas, Nevada and Arizona are growing very fast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 04:08 PM
 
Location: Seattle WA, USA
5,699 posts, read 4,922,938 times
Reputation: 4942
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weidehond View Post
Maybe the most stupid question ever, but I always asked this to myself.


I mean, in this modern age, you don't nessecarily have to live at places where agriculture is possible. Nevertheless, in places north of the 60th parallel, polulation growth is mostly negative (Iceland is an exception).


Cold and darkness will give some explanation but there should be more reasons.


Any ideas?
well there is a lot of growth in cities near the oil fields in western Siberia

Surgut (61°15′N) 340,845 (2015); 306,675 (2010); 285,027 (2002)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgut

Nizhnevartovsk (60°57′N) 251,694 (2010); 239,044 (2002)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nizhnevartovsk

Neftyugansk (61°05′N) 122,855 (2010); 107,830 (2002)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nefteyugansk

Novy Urengoy (66°05′N) 104,107 (2010); 94,456 (2002)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novy_Urengoy

Khanty-Mansiysk (61°00′N) 80,151 (2010); 53,953 (2002)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khanty-Mansiysk

There are other Siberian cities that are growing too, but yes many are in decline

Yakutsk (62°02′N) 269,601 (2010 Census); 210,642 (2002)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yakutsk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 04:11 PM
 
Location: Trondheim, Norway - 63 N
3,600 posts, read 2,691,449 times
Reputation: 1872
Sure there are farming north of 60N. At least in Europe.

Both Trondheim and the province are seeing population growth, some of that growth is due to young people moving to cities. But there is net growth.
Agriculture in the province is common, including grain fields.
Grainfield in Steinkjer, 90 km N of Trondheim: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/C...a_Overrein.jpg

Even far north Troms province has seen growth, mostly in Tromsø.

Hammerfest has grown a lot (percentage-wise) due to offshore oil and gas development.

This the high school for agriculture at the Vesterålen islands, north of Lofoten, more than 200 km N of the Arctic Circle (68 N): https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/C...%A5_Kleiva.jpg

Adn even further north: Experimenting with growing grain in Tromsø for making beer: https://www.nrk.no/troms/nordnorsk-j...orn-1.12716928

Last edited by Jakobsli; 06-18-2016 at 04:42 PM.. Reason: one more link showing agriculture way north of 60 N
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 04:50 PM
 
Location: Finland
24,128 posts, read 24,797,212 times
Reputation: 11103
Yes, but as Finland has half of the World's arable land above the 60 parallel, it's historically a big reason why the northern areas are sparsely populated. The Nordics are also by far the mildest larger region on Earth above that parallel.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-18-2016, 04:54 PM
 
Location: Seoul
11,554 posts, read 9,322,053 times
Reputation: 4660
Let's not forget about the brutal winters in most of these places. In North America brutal winters start at 40 degrees and up, so by the time you reach 60N it's just a frozen wasteland. In East Asia brutal winters also start at around 37-40 degrees, so most of the population lives south of there
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Weather

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top