Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-22-2014, 06:23 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,359 posts, read 6,532,723 times
Reputation: 5182

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by toll_booth View Post
I honestly don't see how the blue line can continue westbound west of 285. Sure they can extend it to the long-overdue MLK station, but after that, that freight rail corridor takes a sudden turn south. Now if the heavy rail line were to follow suit, it might make more sense.
It can follow the highway just like I-20 East or the Red Line extension will.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2014, 07:10 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,879,410 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
It can follow the highway just like I-20 East or the Red Line extension will.
Building transit lines along freeway corridors is not ideal, since there is a lot of congestion around interchanges.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 11:21 AM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,359 posts, read 6,532,723 times
Reputation: 5182
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Building transit lines along freeway corridors is not ideal, since there is a lot of congestion around interchanges.
So? The congestion is already there. If you build transit, it's just all headed to the station instead of the highway. You can also encourage high-density development around the interchanges so people can walk to the stations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 11:23 AM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,879,410 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
So? The congestion is already there. If you build transit, it's just all headed to the station instead of the highway. You can also encourage high-density development around the interchanges so people can walk to the stations.
I'd rather see stations located in town centers, downtowns, and major business districts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:11 PM
 
Location: East Point
4,790 posts, read 6,878,856 times
Reputation: 4782
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
I'd rather see stations located in town centers, downtowns, and major business districts.
i agree; this project (400 north) could be so much more if it served areas like downtown roswell, downtown alpharetta, and the verizon amphitheatre rather than just a bunch of freeway interchanges. unfortunately, MARTA is not going to do that; they say it costs too much.

it's a shame we have to build homes around our transit rather than build our transit around our homes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:41 PM
 
Location: Kirkwood
23,726 posts, read 24,879,410 times
Reputation: 5703
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3 View Post
i agree; this project (400 north) could be so much more if it served areas like downtown roswell, downtown alpharetta, and the verizon amphitheatre rather than just a bunch of freeway interchanges. unfortunately, MARTA is not going to do that; they say it costs too much.

it's a shame we have to build homes around our transit rather than build our transit around our homes.
That's the way it should be. Even in NYC the elevated portions were built before major development in anticipation. We should not spend billions of public funds to build transit lines to development, private developers should be encouraged by land uses to build near transit stations. Its the same argument about building a 1 station MARTA stub line to Turner Field, we should not spend millions to build a publicly-funded line to a private development, when the owners could up and move at the end of their lease.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,359 posts, read 6,532,723 times
Reputation: 5182
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
I'd rather see stations located in town centers, downtowns, and major business districts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3 View Post
i agree; this project (400 north) could be so much more if it served areas like downtown roswell, downtown alpharetta, and the verizon amphitheatre rather than just a bunch of freeway interchanges. unfortunately, MARTA is not going to do that; they say it costs too much.

it's a shame we have to build homes around our transit rather than build our transit around our homes.
Would you rather wait 50 years until we can build the $10 Billion tunnels necessary to hit downtown Roswell and Alpharetta, or run the line by the highway for $2 Billion now? It might not be perfect, but we can run buses or streetcars off the trunk network into the downtown areas for minimal cost. Plus, there are already a lot of development nodes at the highway so why are they less deserving of service than the downtown areas especially when it's faster and cheaper to serve them?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 01:07 PM
 
Location: Georgia
5,845 posts, read 6,161,287 times
Reputation: 3573
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
It can follow the highway just like I-20 East or the Red Line extension will.
A major problem is going to be ROW. Either the line would have to make sharp curves at both MLK/285 and 20/285, which is not good for HRT, or it would have to be elevated over MLK drive until it reaches I-20.

If it's South Cobb that you want to bring onto the MARTA network, I suggest making an HRT corridor through Mableton and Austell, next to the existing freight rail line there. That would disrupt far less of the existing ROW.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 01:11 PM
 
10,396 posts, read 11,511,207 times
Reputation: 7835
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
It can follow the highway just like I-20 East or the Red Line extension will.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
Building transit lines along freeway corridors is not ideal, since there is a lot of congestion around interchanges.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
So? The congestion is already there. If you build transit, it's just all headed to the station instead of the highway. You can also encourage high-density development around the interchanges so people can walk to the stations.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cqholt View Post
I'd rather see stations located in town centers, downtowns, and major business districts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bryantm3 View Post
i agree; this project (400 north) could be so much more if it served areas like downtown roswell, downtown alpharetta, and the verizon amphitheatre rather than just a bunch of freeway interchanges. unfortunately, MARTA is not going to do that; they say it costs too much.

it's a shame we have to build homes around our transit rather than build our transit around our homes.
These are all excellent points.

In the case of a future extension of the MARTA Blue Line, the best move would likely be to extend the Blue Line west along the right-of-way of Georgia Highway 139 to Mableton where there is a building push by area residents to redevelop the unincorporated area into a transit-oriented urban village. The Blue Line could then be extended further west along the NS/Southern Railroad ROW to the historic downtowns of Austell, Lithia Springs and Douglasville where community leaders desperately want to see their historic downtowns redeveloped to human-scale around high-capacity transit stations.

I also agree with bryant3 that an extension of the MARTA Red Line would be so much better if it served areas like Downtown Roswell, Downtown Alpharetta and the Verizon Amphitheatre rather than just the right-of-way of the Georgia 400 Freeway.

But the main reason that the MARTA Red Line is poised to be extended along the Georgia 400 North corridor is not only because of cost, but also because powerful real estate development interests in North Fulton County want the Red Line to serve North Point Mall and the new Avalon development at the NW corner of the Old Milton Parkway and GA 400 interchange.

There is also a substantial amount of undeveloped land available to be developed around the GA 400 and Windward Parkway interchange where the powers-that-be ultimately want the north terminus of the Red Line to be.

The proposed MARTA Red Line extension is not just about taking vehicular traffic off of a severely-congested and built-out GA 400 North roadway. The proposed MARTA Red Line extension is also about building more real estate development along a GA 400 corridor where there is still undeveloped land available to build on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2014, 04:01 PM
 
Location: Georgia
5,845 posts, read 6,161,287 times
Reputation: 3573
Quote:
Originally Posted by Born 2 Roll View Post
In the case of a future extension of the MARTA Blue Line, the best move would likely be to extend the Blue Line west along the right-of-way of Georgia Highway 139 to Mableton where there is a building push by area residents to redevelop the unincorporated area into a transit-oriented urban village. The Blue Line could then be extended further west along the NS/Southern Railroad ROW to the historic downtowns of Austell, Lithia Springs and Douglasville where community leaders desperately want to see their historic downtowns redeveloped to human-scale around high-capacity transit stations.
Interesting. Got any links to this?

Mableton shouldn't be a problem here; there are some significant tracts of land just north of US 278 near Floyd road. But Austell is a different story. They would have to displace a lot of buildings to put in a MARTA station in "downtown" Austell.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Georgia > Atlanta

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:03 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top