Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-13-2011, 03:16 PM
 
Location: San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties
6,390 posts, read 9,684,265 times
Reputation: 2622

Advertisements

Quote:
That Forever 21 store and that whole shopping center was the first shopping center in this county
Well, no it wasn't, and Forever 21 has only been there a couple of year, Korean owned you know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-13-2011, 06:53 PM
 
Location: Northern Colorado
4,932 posts, read 12,761,515 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by .highnlite View Post
Well, no it wasn't, and Forever 21 has only been there a couple of year, Korean owned you know.
It was or the Madonna Plaza was. The SLO Promenade used to be the Central Coast Mall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 07:34 PM
 
Location: San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara Counties
6,390 posts, read 9,684,265 times
Reputation: 2622
No, now, I could tell you two earlier shopping centers, but, it is more fun for you to do the research, at least, I like research, so I expect everyone else does too, except apparently, for the conservatives around here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 07:51 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by the city View Post
Well I for one am glad that Forever 21 will be stepping aside for a Macy's. Macy's fits SLO, Forever 21 does not.
Yes a store with a target demographic of 14~25 doesn't fit a town with a large college demographic. I'm sure the women at Cal Poly will be glad to pay double for the same cloths at Macy's.

SLO is just a bad city to do business in, so many restrictions etc. But whatever, the residents can have their overpriced turd sock.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 10:28 PM
 
Location: Northern Colorado
4,932 posts, read 12,761,515 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
Yes a store with a target demographic of 14~25 doesn't fit a town with a large college demographic. I'm sure the women at Cal Poly will be glad to pay double for the same cloths at Macy's.

SLO is just a bad city to do business in, so many restrictions etc. But whatever, the residents can have their overpriced turd sock.
You can get college type clothing at many places already. Do we really need 110,000 sq. ft Forever 21+Gap+Banana Republic+Abercrombie and Fitch+Urban Outfitters+all others?
There is Sears and Kohl's for cheap stuff. But nothing fits the niche of a high-end traditional department store. Not to mention 6,800 of SLO's population is not there all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-13-2011, 10:45 PM
 
Location: Conejo Valley, CA
12,460 posts, read 20,087,251 times
Reputation: 4365
Quote:
Originally Posted by the city View Post
You can get college type clothing at many places already. Do we really need 110,000 sq. ft Forever 21+Gap+Banana Republic+Abercrombie and Fitch+Urban Outfitters+all others?
What you or I think SLO "needs" isn't too relevant. I have no idea if the population there is sufficient to support the stores, but the idea that Forever 21 isn't a good fit for a college town is rather odd.

Quote:
Originally Posted by the city View Post
There is Sears and Kohl's for cheap stuff.
And when those Cal Poly students age another 10~20 years they may be interested in shopping at those stores. Also since when is Macy's a high-end department store? Its just one step above Kohl's.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2011, 02:19 PM
 
Location: Northern Colorado
4,932 posts, read 12,761,515 times
Reputation: 1364
Quote:
Originally Posted by user_id View Post
What you or I think SLO "needs" isn't too relevant. I have no idea if the population there is sufficient to support the stores, but the idea that Forever 21 isn't a good fit for a college town is rather odd.


And when those Cal Poly students age another 10~20 years they may be interested in shopping at those stores. Also since when is Macy's a high-end department store? Its just one step above Kohl's.
My point is that with all the competition and a city of 50,000 population I don't see us having much support for a Forever 21 if that size. And besides I never see anyone in there. Maybe a smaller Forever 21 would work.

It's a step above JcPenney's, Sears, and Kohl's. Some Macy's are lower-end and some are high end. The one in NYC and San Francisco are more higher end. But for darn hell I would not consider it a cheap place. It's a traditional department and that building is a 1980s mall department store building. The only remaining sign that we had a mall. When people wonder why we have a Macy's they learn we used to have a mall.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2011, 11:47 AM
 
Location: Northern Colorado
4,932 posts, read 12,761,515 times
Reputation: 1364
Is their any building or building that could be expanded or could currently fit a Macy's with 100,000 sq. ft?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2011, 12:03 PM
 
168 posts, read 554,436 times
Reputation: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by the city View Post
Is their any building or building that could be expanded or could currently fit a Macy's with 100,000 sq. ft?
Umm no. Not without a major environmental review and/or conditional use permit approval. An EIR alone will set you back about $500,000. So why on earth would a store do that to themselves with obviously the trend is smaller/leaner and they are still trying to recover from the recession with the likes of targent/amazon/Forever 21 beating them out on every single price point?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-02-2011, 12:47 PM
 
Location: Northern Colorado
4,932 posts, read 12,761,515 times
Reputation: 1364
Kohl's+Ralph's=110,000 sq. ft.
Forever 21=105,000 sq. ft.
The Embassey Suites would also fit.

Otherwise I can only think a new building could fit the space.

And Macy's is just one step up from Forever 21 and Target. And people would prefer shopping at that one step up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > California

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top