Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-24-2010, 10:45 AM
 
Location: The western periphery of Terra Australis
24,544 posts, read 56,076,059 times
Reputation: 11862

Advertisements

First time I've heard of it. Guess I haven't been a good Christian and read every word of the Bible. Darn sometimes I wish some parts of the Bible weren't in there, is God really supposed to have said that?

Last edited by Trimac20; 12-24-2010 at 12:09 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2010, 10:51 AM
 
Location: Florida
76,971 posts, read 47,651,295 times
Reputation: 14806
Quote:
Originally Posted by hiker45 View Post
Here is what Deuteronomy 25:11-12 says,

"If two men are fighting and the wife of one of them comes to rescue her husband from his assailant, and she reaches out and seizes him by his private parts, you shall cut off her hand. Show her no pity. "

Don't you think that is a little harsh? Have you ever known this law to be inforced?
It is the Biblical "don't touch my junk" law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 11:03 AM
 
Location: earth?
7,284 posts, read 12,929,816 times
Reputation: 8956
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzymom View Post
Why does it have to be an argument?
I am using the word "argument" as it is used in debate.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 11:09 AM
 
Location: New York City
5,553 posts, read 8,006,684 times
Reputation: 1362
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
First time I've heard of it. Guess I haven't been a good Christian and read every word of the people. Darn sometimes I wish some parts of the Bible weren't in there, is God really supposed to have said that?
You might find these 2 threads interesting then:

//www.city-data.com/forum/relig...testament.html

//www.city-data.com/forum/relig...barrassed.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 11:30 AM
 
63,818 posts, read 40,109,822 times
Reputation: 7876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzymom View Post
You either accept the Old Testament as divine or you don't. It it is a book you take your Christian prophecies from it. It was an ancient people living in a different time. They didn't act much different then the rest of the world at the time. I agree life was primitive, and it was the ancient world. Life and people can behave in primitive ways now.0.

My point is you have this book attached to the NT and you use it to prove the messiah and end time beliefs.

My assertions are not childish. You can't have it both ways. Either the book is from G-d or not. Either its full of ignorance or its not. You are cherry picking. The book is full of prophetic writings and so either they are prophets or they are not.

My stance is not childish.
Yes we can have it both ways . . . and it is unavoidable. Regardless of the Divine Source of the inspirations . . . they were INSPIRATIONS NOT DICTATIONS. They were interpreted and translated into the cognitive structures, idioms, cultural mindsets and superstitious beliefs of our ignorant ancestors, period. They MUST be properly divided.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzymom View Post
Hi Ilene,

I am not an atheist I am a Jew. I have several Jewish and Christian Bible in my home that I read. I believe in G-d and I understand the readings of my Hebrew scripture in a non literal way.

There is much in the book that bothers me but I look at it (or try to) from the time it was written and to see who it was being written for. I did not grow up in a religious home. But my father was a theologian who had a pHD in early church history. So religion was a subject we talked about in my home, but not on a doctrinal level.

My point is the book is full of many different types of writings and it was written in a time that was vastly different then ours. It was written by many many different people over a period of time. I tend to agree that there is much in the Hebrew Scripture that is awful. But I also see good in the stories.

What I have issue with is that Christians on the one hand use it to prove their theology and prophecies and messiah, then they slam it as a ignorant book full of primitive writings.

It seems to me if that is the case why not just only have the NT and leave the OT?
The scriptures are for different SPIRITUAL purposes. The OT explains the evolution and failed struggles to understand God and the early "training wheels" guidance for our spiritually immature ancestors floundering in their ignorance. The OT also provides the signs and the Hope of a promised Messiah (messenger) who would explain God to us, clear up our confusion and become the Way, the Truth and the Light of the world to eternal life with God. The fate of the Messiah was known and unavoidable because of the barbarous era during which He was to bring His enlightened message . . . NOT because God demanded it!!! The barbaric religious leaders were guaranteed to eliminate Him and His message . . . and to do so barbarically. THAT was the cup Jesus asked our Father if there wasn't some way to avoid.

The NT describes the TRUE NATURE of God through Jesus' unambiguous example and message . . . but it still has been filtered through the ignorance, superstition, human flaws, and desires for power and control of the subsequent so-called leaders of Christianity. Fortunately, upon His death . . . Jesus' human consciousness was reborn as Spirit and is a permanent part of our collective human consciousness. He abides with us. His Holy Spirit is available within ALL our consciousnesses . . . IF we are receptive to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Arizona
28,956 posts, read 16,369,586 times
Reputation: 2296
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
Yes we can have it both ways . . . and it is unavoidable. Regardless of the Divine Source of the inspirations . . . they were INSPIRATIONS NOT DICTATIONS. They were interpreted and translated into the cognitive structures, idioms, cultural mindsets and superstitious beliefs of our ignorant ancestors, period. They MUST be properly divided.

The scriptures are for different SPIRITUAL purposes. The OT explains the evolution and failed struggles to understand God and the early "training wheels" guidance for our spiritually immature ancestors floundering in their ignorance. The OT also provides the signs and the Hope of a promised Messiah (messenger) who would explain God to us, clear up our confusion and become the Way, the Truth and the Light of the world to eternal life with God. The fate of the Messiah was known and unavoidable because of the barbarous era during which He was to bring His enlightened message . . . NOT because God demanded it!!! The barbaric religious leaders were guaranteed to eliminate Him and His message . . . and to do so barbarically. THAT was the cup Jesus asked our Father if there wasn't some way to avoid.

The NT describes the TRUE NATURE of God through Jesus' unambiguous example and message . . . but it still has been filtered through the ignorance, superstition, human flaws, and desires for power and control of the subsequent so-called leaders of Christianity. Fortunately, upon His death . . . Jesus' human consciousness was reborn as Spirit and is a permanent part of our collective human consciousness. He abides with us. His Holy Spirit is available within ALL our consciousnesses . . . IF we are receptive to it.
"A result of juxtaposition for contrasting; good and evil."

Although many have been deceived, believing evil to be good.

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Sitting beside Walden Pond
4,612 posts, read 4,896,799 times
Reputation: 1408
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trimac20 View Post
First time I've heard of it. Guess I haven't been a good Christian and read every word of the Bible. Darn sometimes I wish some parts of the Bible weren't in there, is God really supposed to have said that?
I doubt that God gave any commandments about a lady grabbing some guy's private parts, but the ancient Jews decided to make it one of their laws.

It makes you wonder why they did it. Looks like the old Jewish women had a habit of getting involved when their men had a disagreement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 12:40 PM
 
4,082 posts, read 5,044,013 times
Reputation: 818
Quote:
Originally Posted by MysticPhD View Post
Yes we can have it both ways . . . and it is unavoidable. Regardless of the Divine Source of the inspirations . . . they were INSPIRATIONS NOT DICTATIONS. They were interpreted and translated into the cognitive structures, idioms, cultural mindsets and superstitious beliefs of our ignorant ancestors, period. They MUST be properly divided.

The scriptures are for different SPIRITUAL purposes. The OT explains the evolution and failed struggles to understand God and the early "training wheels" guidance for our spiritually immature ancestors floundering in their ignorance. The OT also provides the signs and the Hope of a promised Messiah (messenger) who would explain God to us, clear up our confusion and become the Way, the Truth and the Light of the world to eternal life with God. The fate of the Messiah was known and unavoidable because of the barbarous era during which He was to bring His enlightened message . . . NOT because God demanded it!!! The barbaric religious leaders were guaranteed to eliminate Him and His message . . . and to do so barbarically. THAT was the cup Jesus asked our Father if there wasn't some way to avoid.

The NT describes the TRUE NATURE of God through Jesus' unambiguous example and message . . . but it still has been filtered through the ignorance, superstition, human flaws, and desires for power and control of the subsequent so-called leaders of Christianity. Fortunately, upon His death . . . Jesus' human consciousness was reborn as Spirit and is a permanent part of our collective human consciousness. He abides with us. His Holy Spirit is available within ALL our consciousnesses . . . IF we are receptive to it.

If you want to have it both ways then don't be so surprised when non Christians don't take you seriously.

You cannot cherry pick and use the Old Testament to prove your points when you want to and ignore the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 12:43 PM
 
63,818 posts, read 40,109,822 times
Reputation: 7876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzymom View Post
If you want to have it both ways then don't be so surprised when non Christians don't take you seriously.

You cannot cherry pick and use the Old Testament to prove your points when you want to and ignore the rest.
Did you read my post carefully, Jazzymom? We ignore nothing . . . we properly interpret it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2010, 12:57 PM
 
Location: Italy
6,387 posts, read 6,370,905 times
Reputation: 875
I would like to add some information to this thread, with the hope that we may come to a better understanding of the Scriptures. (This is based on the following assumptions: a) scripture is symbolic and spiritual, not literal; b) the scriptures were inspired by God and useful for our growth in Him.)

In Deut. 23.1, we read the following:
"He that is wounded in the stones, or hath his privy member cut off, shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD."

Now many of the verses in the OT are related to others in other places. For example, the Lord did not intend to give Israel a king, but since they insisted, He gave them their wish. Many problems insued, all due to this king. If we read a passage within the period in which Israel was led by a king, we can draw a lot of different conclusions, but the fact remains, that the Lord did not want Israel to have a king. See what I mean?

Well, back to the verse above.
My understanding is that the spirit of man is considered male, and the soul female. When we are talking about male figures, they are often referring to the spirit in (any) man. King David, or Isaiah, or Jonah, for example.

When we read about a female figure, we read of the soul in (any) man. Bathsheeba is an example. Ruth is another.

The scripture above tells us that if a man is wounded in the part of the body which carries life-giving seed, he is not allowed to enter the congregation or assembly of the Lord.

The female (soul) who prevents this suffers a loss in her "work" (hand) by harming that which is of the spirit.


Just reflecting a bit..

Blessings!
Brian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Religion and Spirituality > Christianity
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top