Scripture and gay marriage (legislation, mission, reasons, temple)

[pcamps]

Originally Posted by Fundamentalist

Yes....that is pretty much a no brainer. If you had a sister and you found out her husband was cheating on her. Are you not going to go to her husband and tell him what he is doing is wrong and he should stop (which is called judging) or are you going to keep your mouth shut let it go on and pray she doesn't contract some awful disease?

and when your sister gets a disease and finds out you knew of the affair and didn't tell her what then..............

I am referring to condemnation, as judgement and condemnation as the same meaning to a christian.

Now show me one scripture where Jesus called the lost on their sin ?

[pcamps]

Originally Posted by phazelwood

i answered your yes or no question you always complain people do not do, quit whining.

lol

[Fundamentalist]

Originally Posted by pcamps

I never address them (strawman)
Fundy show me where i have ignored anything please .I have noticed on many threads you go missing even on the ones you have started.

I just asked you a question which you obviously chose to ignore .

What about the market place ? The house of prayer had become a den of robbers, robbing the lost .Don't you think these robbers were just converts of the pharisees ? He never rebuked the rich young ruler He told him what he lacked just like the rest of us we all fall short .

Is there a chance you can answer the question or do you expect answers from others but are not willing to answer yourself ?.

I didn't say he rebuked the rich young ruler but HE GAVE HIM THE LAW, NO GRACE! the rich young ruler was self righteous

So were back at that, somehow it was a pharisee conspiracy-that the men in the market were tied to the Phariesse. NO! Pcamp I DON'T KNOW, scripture doesn't say anything. I only assume the market people were of regualr Joes and the Pharisees allowed them access in the temple.

You can't fill in the blanks to justify your position.

[Fundamentalist]

Originally Posted by pcamps

I am referring to condemnation, as judgement and condemnation as the same meaning to a christian.

Now show me one scripture where Jesus called the lost on their sin ?

Now it doesn't mean the same? interesting....means the same where I stand

The woman at the well, how about the woman who was about to be stone. Jesus tld her, go and sin no more.

[pcamps]

Originally Posted by Fundamentalist

I am not whining just making an observation. I noticed you rambling on about this verse and that...men having anal sex...it was really sort of hilarious to justify it is not a sin. Your opinion but to bash Robin over the head with the bible that he is somehow being judgmental is unfair.

You wouldn't have done that to him if he was talking about stealing or any other sin would you?

It does not matter what is perceived as sin whether it be homosexuality or stealing , i am not getting involved.

The spirit that prevails evidently on here is one of condemnation , with no evidence to bring those who they consider aa sinner to faith in Christ.

Condemning sin will never lead a man to repentance . It's the goodness of God that does that .

For some unknown reason the christian rejects this truth and thinks if we tell the world how sinful it is ,it will come to repentance.

[Fundamentalist]

Originally Posted by pcamps

It does not matter what is perceived as sin whether it be homosexuality or stealing , i am not getting involved.

The spirit that prevails evidently on here is one of condemnation , with no evidence to bring those who they consider aa sinner to faith in Christ.

Condemning sin will never lead a man to repentance . It's the goodness of God that does that .

For some unknown reason the christian rejects this truth and thinks if we tell the world how sinful it is ,it will come to repentance.

So then why do you care? What is the big deal? It shouldn't matter since they can't change God's will

[pcamps]

Originally Posted by Fundamentalist

I didn't say he rebuked the rich young ruler but HE GAVE HIM THE LAW, NO GRACE!

So were back at that, somehow it was a pharisee conspiracy-that the men in the market were tied to the Phariesse. NO! Pcamp I DON'T KNOW, scripture doesn't say anything. I only assume the market people were of regualr Joes and the Pharisees allowed them access in the temple.

You can't fill in the blanks to justify your position.

Do you really read what you are saying you just said i cannot fill in the blanks , then you just did with regular joes lmao .

[pcamps]

Originally Posted by Fundamentalist

So then why do you care? What is the big deal?

Care about what Fundy ? .

[Phazelwood]

Originally Posted by Fundamentalist

I have no idea what that means and I never disagreed with you.

Ah, ignoring your ridicule while trying to righteously correct me eh? Hypocrite

you using the bible to bash Robin over the head that somehow he is being judgmental about a sin which he is justified as a Christian to point out and condemn it.

You didn't read the exchage between us close enough, you were too busy in your agreement of her and your ridicule of me to pay any attention.

The conversation between me and Robin resulted in an accusation of me , rather than addressing a point in scripture. That accusation was deemed righteous because her words were biblical. So you really are saying something that carries no validity whatsoever.

You yourself are doing to him what you accuse him of doing

Nope, I do not hide behind a God to justify what I say.

Quit whining.

[Fundamentalist]

Originally Posted by pcamps

Do you really read what you are saying you just said i cannot fill in the blanks , then you just did with regular joes lmao .

No pcapm.....I said I don't know. You are the one making the amphatic statement that somehow these men in the market were somehow Pharisees. Scripture says nothing about these people.