Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As far as importance....no. While the city proper populations are pretty close, pretty much every other measurable is slanted Knoxville's way. What puts Knoxville solidly as 3rd is the presence of UT's main campus. There's also ORNL in the metro area.
I can see, however, how Chattanooga could be one's 3rd as far as preference, though.
As far as importance....no. While the city proper populations are pretty close, pretty much every other measurable is slanted Knoxville's way. What puts Knoxville solidly as 3rd is the presence of UT's main campus. There's also ORNL in the metro area.
I can see, however, how Chattanooga could be one's 3rd as far as preference, though.
That pretty much would be my answer as well, Nashvols. As to JMT's observation about the 1,2,3 license designations referring to the size of the counties in TN, that's correct. Back when the plates were done in that manner the metro areas were closer to being just the county those cities were in, though not entirely. When I looked at a 2-xxxxx number I knew it meant the Nashville metro area.
1. Cincinnati/Cleveland (interchangeable; and you can tack Akron onto Cleveland and Dayton onto Cincinnati to create larger metroplexes)
3. Columbus
4. Dayton
5. Toledo
6. Akron
7. Canton
8. Youngstown
Conneticut could be intresting 1-4 (Hartford, New Haven, Bridgeport, Stamford) are practically interchangable my opinion is
Hartford
Stamford
New Haven
Bridgeport
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.