Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I prefer Orlando. Looks like their buildings are taller. Bellevue WA or Newark NJ?
I'm sorry. I don't know how I goofed this up but I choose Grand Rapids. They look like they have similar density but GR buildings look taller. Now for the latest pairing I choose Minneapolis. I like the architecture more. I love both though.
Going with Charlotte here, by a hair. Minneapolis has more density though and more buildings.
Charlotte's tallest is one of my favorite skyscrapers in the US--design wise.
Fort Worth vs Tampa?
While I don't find either particularly inspiring, Tampa wins this one for me. It's got more architectural variation and height. Plus it looks more aesthetic with the water. Fort Worth is more boxy in comparison.
While I don't find either particularly inspiring, Tampa wins this one for me. It's got more architectural variation and height. Plus it looks more aesthetic with the water. Fort Worth is more boxy in comparison.
Jacksonville or Norfolk?
Jacksonville because it has taller buildings. El Paso or Tucson?
I picked Boise because it looks more compact. Salt Lake City or Sacramento?
Sacramento. Salt Lake has a nice lil chunk of density but it's not enough against California's Capital, which is a larger skyline a nice chunk of density itself and upon looking closely has some nice interesting architecture tucked in there
Sacramento. Salt Lake has a nice lil chunk of density but it's not enough against California's Capital, which is a larger skyline a nice chunk of density itself and upon looking closely has some nice interesting architecture tucked in there
Calgary or Vancouver
Vancouver is a lot larger and denser. I also like Vancouver's scenery better. I think Vancouver could use more distinctive architecture. It could be Honolulu or Miami and I could not tell other than size.
Vancouver is a lot larger and denser. I also like Vancouver's scenery better. I think Vancouver could use more distinctive architecture. It could be Honolulu or Miami and I could not tell other than size.
Nashville or San Antonio?
San Antonio has some nice buildings but Nashville's sheer number of towers tips it in it's favor with many more on the way. Tulsa or Memphis?
San Antonio has some nice buildings but Nashville's sheer number of towers tips it in it's favor with many more on the way. Tulsa or Memphis?
I like Tulsa here, with this matchup. For its size, Tulsa has an incredible skyline, with several tall skyscrapers. Not a huge amount of high rises and skyscrapers overall, but it is very powerful in terms of its aesthetic and height.
Memphis has a decent skyline, but needs 2 or 3 new towers between 300-400 feet.
Tulsa or Omaha?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
