Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Atlanta, Very Modern and Pretty Buildings, Could Use more density though, Philly for Density but Atlanta overall
Calgary (which is becoming impressive) or Pittsburgh (tons of natural beauty)
Pittsburgh for me. Pittsburgh has more aesthetically pleasing architecture overall, and has a great natural setting for a downtown and for density overall.
Calgary is growing, but against Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh edges it for me.
I like Philly's density--it's much better than Atlanta's overall. Atlanta has the longer, impressive skyline, but Atlanta's downtown is sparse compared to Philly's center city.
Hartford, CT or Louisville, KY?
Louisville because of the Ohio river and nice collection of buildings. Nothing too gawdy or out of place.
Charlotte, Just the Beauty of the Buildings, Cleveland has a Nice Classic skyline though
New Orleans or Philadelphia
Philly all day. Much more attractive Downtown with a blend of old and brand spanking new architecture. New Orleans has a relatively small downtown in comparison.
Philly all day. Much more attractive Downtown with a blend of old and brand spanking new architecture. New Orleans has a relatively small downtown in comparison.
Spokane, WA or El Paso, Tx?
Spokane is better. The angles of the skyline show a lot of density.
Philly all day. Much more attractive Downtown with a blend of old and brand spanking new architecture. New Orleans has a relatively small downtown in comparison.
Spokane, WA or El Paso, Tx?
Spokane. It's a little more dense to me in its downtown, and has a mix of old and new buildings that I like. Also I like the tree cover, the older bridge over the Spokane River near its downtown(I think from Monroe Street?), and the Spokane River (and are those rapids or any small waterfalls along it? reminds me a little of the appearance of the James River through Richmond) which all put Spokane a little over the top here.
I like the mountains in the background of El Paso skyline pics, but to me again, the density, the Spokane River, and the Monroe Street Bridge all make me prefer Spokane.
Spokane. It's a little more dense to me in its downtown, and has a mix of old and new buildings that I like. Also I like the tree cover, the older bridge over the Spokane River near its downtown(I think from Monroe Street?), and the Spokane River (and are those rapids or any small waterfalls along it? reminds me a little of the appearance of the James River through Richmond) which all put Spokane a little over the top here.
I like the mountains in the background of El Paso skyline pics, but to me again, the density, the Spokane River, and the Monroe Street Bridge all make me prefer Spokane.
Shreveport, LA, or Charleston, WV?
Neither but I'd pick Shreveport. Looks taller and more modern. Lincoln NE or Wichita KS?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
