Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-22-2020, 11:03 AM
 
1,526 posts, read 1,983,949 times
Reputation: 1529

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by BPt111 View Post
Charlotte now has more than San Francisco
which means absolutely nothing, especially when you look at the cities' land area - Charlotte's is 309 sq miles compared to San Fran's 47 sq miles.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-22-2020, 11:17 AM
 
Location: That star on your map in the middle of the East Coast, DMV
8,128 posts, read 7,552,695 times
Reputation: 5785
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonBornMassMade View Post
Boston 2020: 693,000
Baltimore 2020: 586,000
Where's the list?

Are these the numbers or people are just guessing?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 11:35 AM
 
Location: Baltimore
21,628 posts, read 12,727,444 times
Reputation: 11216
Quote:
Originally Posted by the resident09 View Post
Where's the list?

Are these the numbers or people are just guessing?
US quickfacts has 2019 population estimates. Boston and Baltimore are declining. These are my 2020 estimates. For Boston I’m taking into account margin of error and I’m assuming it’s stagnant in between 2018 (694k) and 2019 (692k).

SOURCE: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fa...etts/PST045219

Last edited by BostonBornMassMade; 05-22-2020 at 11:47 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 01:42 PM
 
527 posts, read 319,697 times
Reputation: 517
Quote:
Charlotte now has more than San Francisco

That's the way it is with cities with 100s of square miles of land...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 03:20 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
8,323 posts, read 5,481,561 times
Reputation: 12280
Do we have a list of new populations with change from last year?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 03:53 PM
 
129 posts, read 111,120 times
Reputation: 441
Not really shocking news to those that live in Phoenix, but according to this article (based on latest Census numbers) Phoenix grew by more humans than any city in the nation .. for the 4th year in a row.

"The U.S. Census Bureau documented the population of Phoenix to have grown by 26,317 in 2019, increasing the total to an estimated 1,680,992."

The metro (about at 5 million) also just moved into the 10th spot ahead of the Boston metro.

https://ktar.com/story/3176532/phoen...secutive-year/

I don't know where they obtained this info on the Census site though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 04:15 PM
 
718 posts, read 492,317 times
Reputation: 783
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickms View Post
That's the way it is with cities with 100s of square miles of land...
True, however, about 100 miles of that 309 miles is unpopulated land
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 04:17 PM
 
Location: West Seattle
6,374 posts, read 4,987,814 times
Reputation: 8448
Chicagoland really killin' it this year.

Aurora: -1,442
Elgin: -641
Cicero: -681
Waukegan: -605
Evanston: -517
Schaumburg: -501
Skokie: -471
Berwyn: -430
Joliet: -386
Wheaton: -363
Arlington Heights: -356
Orland Park: -322
Tinley Park: -322
Downers Grove: -266
Crystal Lake: -164
Bensenville: -152
Wilmette: -131
Oak Brook: -59
Des Plaines: +45
Glenview: +157
Oak Park: +208
Elmhurst: +257
Naperville: +359

(not a random selection: suburbs that to me seem "major")
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 04:24 PM
 
129 posts, read 111,120 times
Reputation: 441
Quote:
Originally Posted by QC Dreaming 2 View Post
True, however, about 100 miles of that 309 miles is unpopulated land
Yep. You have to understand it's a large boundary, but lots of empty land around Phoenix. The inhabited parts of the city and metro are pretty concentrated.

.. but, that's the usual response. "Sure, but it's a large area".

When looking at urban area density .. Phoenix has a lot more density than people think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-22-2020, 04:33 PM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,150,335 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by QC Dreaming 2 View Post
True, however, about 100 miles of that 309 miles is unpopulated land
What does this exactly mean? I notice that you say unpopulated; that doesn't mean that it's undeveloped or has an undesignated purpose, or does it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top