Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: City with the best looking subway cars?
Atlanta MARTA 39 15.42%
Baltimore Metro Subway 10 3.95%
Boston MBTA 19 7.51%
Chicago EL 37 14.62%
Cleveland RTA 9 3.56%
Los Angeles Metro Rail 46 18.18%
Miami Metrorail 18 7.11%
New York City Subway 53 20.95%
Philadelphia SEPTA 16 6.32%
San Francisco BART 36 14.23%
San Juan Tren Urbano 7 2.77%
Washington D.C. Metro 80 31.62%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 253. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-21-2010, 07:30 PM
 
Location: DC/Brooklyn, NY/Miami, FL
1,178 posts, read 2,955,589 times
Reputation: 391

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by eek View Post

the train you used for nyc is getting phased out in two years or less, iirc.
No the R62/R6A cars are only 20 years old so they have at least 20 years left, since a subway cars life span is 40 years.

Last edited by BKmachine; 05-21-2010 at 08:01 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-21-2010, 07:46 PM
 
196 posts, read 457,906 times
Reputation: 59
Washington D.C. Not only do they look great, they run smoothly too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2010, 10:28 PM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,717 posts, read 8,181,390 times
Reputation: 892
Quote:
Originally Posted by eek View Post
well we had cushions on seats in ny at one time...i don't know why they stopped using them but my guess is that they got knifed up and or worn out/were too costly to replace.

also remember from the 70's until 1989 the subway system was covered inside and out with graffiti. trash (as in paper trash) on the trains was everywhere and some smelled like urine. in the 90's we went through acid etching and scratching on the windows...there's no way cushioned seats would have survived past like 1975.


the train you used for nyc is getting phased out in two years or less, iirc.

they're going to look just like the trains that run on most of the lines now.

i wish we could at least keep human announcers or colored rollsigns on the trains.
Man that sucks, because the 7 train is like the perfect example of what I think trains should look like IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-24-2010, 04:37 AM
 
2,957 posts, read 6,472,270 times
Reputation: 1419
Quote:
Originally Posted by eek View Post
what about the dc metro appeals to ppl, aesthetically?? just curious because its winning the thread...
What I'm curious about is why DC's winning the poll while SF's coming 4th and people are talking about how ugly the BART is. They're the freakin same thing lol! Or at least they seemed practically identical to me a few years back. When I first rode the Metro it felt completely familiar and IIRC they were both built by the same maker. Unless there has been a drastic upgrade in the Metro's interior, I don't remember a whole lot of difference in the trains. NYC's are very different, but BART and the Metro are too similar IMO for BART to be the ugly duckling here and the Metro to be winning the poll lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 12:06 AM
 
Location: Far Northeast, D.C. and Montgomery County, MD
220 posts, read 703,907 times
Reputation: 79
Quote:
Originally Posted by jman650 View Post
What I'm curious about is why DC's winning the poll while SF's coming 4th and people are talking about how ugly the BART is. They're the freakin same thing lol! Or at least they seemed practically identical to me a few years back. When I first rode the Metro it felt completely familiar and IIRC they were both built by the same maker. Unless there has been a drastic upgrade in the Metro's interior, I don't remember a whole lot of difference in the trains. NYC's are very different, but BART and the Metro are too similar IMO for BART to be the ugly duckling here and the Metro to be winning the poll lol.
BART has the worst looking trains in the universe!!! They look like something off Star Trek!!!

And how do they look the same:


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...nch_Avenue.jpg



Image removed by Moderator - copyrighted image. See room sticky for guidelines please: https://www.city-data.com/forum/city-...e-posting.html

Last edited by JMT; 08-24-2012 at 05:18 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 12:07 AM
 
Location: Jersey Boy living in Florida
3,717 posts, read 8,181,390 times
Reputation: 892
Rofl, man San Francisco is such a beautiful city for having the worst looking trains wow. I think someone else said before though that BART trains are really comfortable on the inside, and thats what really matters, but still they look pretty horrible from the street.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 07:56 AM
eek
 
Location: Queens, NY
3,574 posts, read 7,730,128 times
Reputation: 1478
i have to change my replies...

IMO nyc has the best looking cars when you compare them to dc, sf and some of the other cities. the only ones noteworthy IMHO are from philly, boston and chicago.

nyc wins over them because of certain things IMHO. here is some of the stock from nyc...

r46 (these run on the A (occasionally i think), F, G, R, V) :

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3590/...e1936b7232.jpg[/]
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4014/...df44a05a26.jpg[/]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3281/...d83f863fc0.jpg[/]
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2226/...962da6c141.jpg[/]

r68 (runs mostly on the B, D...you might see them on the N still but not sure cuz its been awhile since i've been on the N train...used to be on the Q as well) :

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3443/...d0c87e993f.jpg[/]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3207/...7b9d1edfc5.jpg[/]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3030/...79a8166749.jpg[/]
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/131/3...04c3c4a667.jpg[/]

r32 (these run on various lines. i've seen them on the B, C, E, F, Q, V, W, etc)...i forgot which lines use them now because they keep moving them around. they're the oldest model in our system) :

http://farm1.static.flickr.com/102/3...0b1d708e6a.jpg[/]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3102/...3953518680.jpg[/]
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2407/...47ec65f359.jpg[/]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3442/...fedcb27ed8.jpg[/]

r62 (these run on the numbered lines like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 trains) :

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3187/...84257e30ab.jpg[/]
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/26/50...c0d3f935ba.jpg[/]
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4008/...db995c222a.jpg[/]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3276/...f784e8f592.jpg[/]

r42 (these run/ran on the j, m and z lines...and a few other lines but they're getting retired soon and have been replaced on most lines that ran them with the newer trains) :

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3387/...33b0cda541.jpg[/]
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2487/...4e9bc2b16a.jpg[/]
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/29/50...c3d3f7925a.jpg[/]

and thats not even the newer trains. our trains in the u.s. are still plain overall but if we're going to say who has the best looking trains in the u.s. then i don't see how nyc, chicago, boston or philly doesn't win this thread.

show me something from dc that beats nyc. we have better looking trains inside and out, better looking entrances, etc.

Last edited by JMT; 08-24-2012 at 05:19 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Concrete jungle where dreams are made of.
8,900 posts, read 15,929,225 times
Reputation: 1819
^^Those picture are embarrassing because those trains are like 30 years old, lol. I think the older trains are uuuuuugly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 08:38 AM
eek
 
Location: Queens, NY
3,574 posts, read 7,730,128 times
Reputation: 1478
IMO our system is the best because not only do we have the classic subway look that seemingly everybody borrows but our subways' grittiness adds to the character of nyc.

the new trains look extra sterile, ALL look the same, lost the color of the rollsigns on the sides and front of the train, lost the human announcer, etc. etc.

we're all going to be riding the same trains within a few years. there's no difference between say...the F train and the A-Z trains once they get done with the transition. IMO thats lame.

for example, i liked riding the F train into manhattan and catching a glimpse of a B train on the other side of the platform that was slanted. i didn't really get a chance to see them in jamaica queens like that so seeing them once i got into manhattan was cool to me.

while i didn't like riding the E and preferred the F, seeing the E lose its r32's was kinda sad, knowing this is the end for the trains we grew up with. now the F is mostly r160's...now you don't hear a human announcer. that charm is lost. no orange roll sign. thats lost too. etc. etc.

i agree to disagree about the embarrassment. to me its just another way of making nyc cookie cutter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-25-2010, 08:48 AM
eek
 
Location: Queens, NY
3,574 posts, read 7,730,128 times
Reputation: 1478
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2462/...8afbcb9e32.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2751/...888ff55808.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2680/...b7fa5444ac.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4033/...8099e9748a.jpg

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2410/...068fe51b5a.jpg
http://farm1.static.flickr.com/188/4...c86daf6caa.jpg

and they run on the m, r and w lines. you don't think that thats lame? in comparison to what we had? there's no variety in these whatsoever and there's no color. its like riding a computer. and that violin sound they make when they start and stop is extra loud and annoying.

Last edited by JMT; 08-24-2012 at 05:20 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > General U.S. > City vs. City

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top